CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2021 - E2109. Completion/Progress view

From Expertiza_Wiki
Revision as of 01:04, 1 April 2021 by Jwhostet (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Problem Statement

Expertiza allows users to complete peer reviews on fellow students' work. However, not all peer reviews are helpful, and some are more useful than others. Therefore, the application allows for the project's authors to provide feedback on the peer review, this is called "author feedback." The instructors have no easy way to access the author feedback while grading peer reviews, which would be a useful feature to have since this shows how helpful the peer review actually was to the group that received it. Thus, making the author feedback more accessible is the aim of this project. However, a group in 2018 was tasked with this project as well, and most of the functionality appears to have been implemented already. Our primary task is then to understand their implementation, refactor any code that may require it, and make the suggested improvements that were left in their project feedback.

Goal

There is an author feedback column to the review report, but the previous team's submission added new code to calculate the average. However, this most likely already exists somewhere else in the system, and so we will identify where that functionality exists and refactor the code to reuse it.

In addition, the review report UI is said to be somewhat crowded in its appearance. However, there is often no author feedback, and so the column for that should be made toggleable.

Use wrapping for the reviewer column.