CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2021 - E2109. Completion/Progress view: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
='''Problem Statement'''=
='''Problem Statement'''=
A key component of Expertiza is peer reviews, which provide feedback to authors so that they can improve their work. Expertiza also supports grading of these reviews to ensure students write quality reviews, helping them learn more about the assignment by looking at their peers' work. In addition, Expertiza allows for metareviews, which are reviews the authors of the original work write for the reviews of their original work. This author feedback is useful for grading the reviews because it indicates how helpful this review was to the authors of the original work. The objective of this project is to add metareview or author feedback information to the review report page, which shows a summary of all the reviews written by the students for an assignment.
Expertiza allows users to complete peer reviews on fellow students' work. However, not all peer reviews are helpful, and some are more useful than others. Therefore, the application allows for the project's authors to provide feedback on the peer review, this is called "author feedback." The instructors have no easy way to access the author feedback while grading peer reviews, which would be a useful feature to have since this shows how helpful the peer review actually was to the group that received it. Thus, making the author feedback more accessible is the aim of this project. However, a group in 2018 was tasked with this project as well, and most of the functionality appears to have been implemented already. Our primary task is then to understand their implementation, refactor any code that may require it, and make the suggested improvements that were left in their project feedback.
 
In Expertiza, peer reviews are used as a metric to evaluate someone’s project. Once someone has peer reviewed a project, the authors of the project can also provide feedback for this review, called “author feedback.” While grading peer reviews, it would be nice for the instructors to include the author feedback, since it shows how helpful the peer review actually was to the author of the project. Currently, however, the instructor has no easy way of seeing the author-feedback scores, so it would be far too much trouble to include them in grades for reviewing. The aim of this project is to build this into the system.


='''Goal'''=
='''Goal'''=


The aim of this project is to build this into the system. We need an additional column in the 'Review Report' page for reviews which shows the calculation of the author feedback. This will help instructor's to know how the reviews proved useful to the authors/team. The aim of this project is to integrate the author feedback column in the summary page
The aim of this project is to build this into the system. We need an additional column in the 'Review Report' page for reviews which shows the calculation of the author feedback. This will help instructor's to know how the reviews proved useful to the authors/team. The aim of this project is to integrate the author feedback column in the summary page

Revision as of 00:56, 1 April 2021

Problem Statement

Expertiza allows users to complete peer reviews on fellow students' work. However, not all peer reviews are helpful, and some are more useful than others. Therefore, the application allows for the project's authors to provide feedback on the peer review, this is called "author feedback." The instructors have no easy way to access the author feedback while grading peer reviews, which would be a useful feature to have since this shows how helpful the peer review actually was to the group that received it. Thus, making the author feedback more accessible is the aim of this project. However, a group in 2018 was tasked with this project as well, and most of the functionality appears to have been implemented already. Our primary task is then to understand their implementation, refactor any code that may require it, and make the suggested improvements that were left in their project feedback.

Goal

The aim of this project is to build this into the system. We need an additional column in the 'Review Report' page for reviews which shows the calculation of the author feedback. This will help instructor's to know how the reviews proved useful to the authors/team. The aim of this project is to integrate the author feedback column in the summary page

Retrieved from "https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?title=CSC/ECE_517_Spring_2021_-_E2109._Completion/Progress_view&oldid=138543"