CSC/ECE 506 Spring 2011/ch2a mc

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

The Graphical Processing Unit (GPU) is a dedicated super-threaded, massively data parallel co-processor. Unlike the CPU, GPUs are designed to be highly parallel, have a high computational throughput, and high memory throughput. CPUs are architected to perform well for single and multi-threaded applications. A number of programming APIs have been introduced to allow programmers to harness the power of the GPU to perform parallel tasks. Two such architectures are OpenCL and Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA).

OpenCL

Programming Model

As of version 1.1 of the OpenCL specification, the programming model of OpenCL is a hybrid of task parallelism and data parallelism. We will first describe the key concepts of OpenCL:

Platform Model

Figure 1: OpenCL Platform Model (from OpenCL Spec 1.1)

As shown in Figure 1, the platform for running OpenCL programs somewhat resembles a network of computer clusters. The parallel is relatively close: each Compute Device behaves like a cluster, which consists of computers (in the form of Compute Unit - CU), and each Compute Unit can contain multiple Processing Element(PE), much like a computer can contain multiple CPUs.

Execution Model

Figure 2: Execution Model (OpenCL Spec 1.1)

Figure 2 depicts the conceptual model of execution. There is host program executes on the host and manages the execution of multiple compute kernels. Each compute kernel can execute in parallel, on separate work-item. Work-items close together can then be grouped into work-group. This execution model closely matches the platform model described above, as each PE often executes one kernel, and one workgroup is often handled by one CU.

Memory Model

The memory model of OpenCL reflects the design of the Platform Model and Execution Model. Specifically, there are four levels of memory, as shown in the table below:

Memory Regions Accessible by
Global Memory All work-items in all work-groups
Constant Memory All work-items in all work-groups
Local Memory All work-items in a work-group
Private Memory Private to a work-item

Programming Model

To take advantage of OpenCL architecture, two programming models can be used. The first one is data parallel programming model and the other one is task parallel programming model. In the data parallel programming model, every computer kernel executes the same block of code, but on different data. Therefore, conceptually there is one global program counter for all computer kernels. The programmer can choose to manually partition the kernels into group, or delegate this task to the OpenCL middleware. Beside the data parallel programming model, programmer can choose to use the task parallel programming model. In this case, each PE will execute a separate compute kernel and parallelism is achieved by running multiple kernels on separate work-item.

Implementation

AMD Implementation

The first is GPU generation from AMD that supports OpenCL 1.1 is the Radeon HD 5000 series. Latest generations also support OpenCL 1.1, at the same time significantly improve performance due to architectural refinements. The table below will summarize key characteristics of Radeon HD 6000 GPUs

Model Clock rate Config core Memory TDP (W) Double-precision FP
Core (MHz) Memory (MHz) Bandwidth (GB/s) Bus type Bus width (bit) Idle Max.
Radeon HD 6450 625-750 533-800 800-900 160:8:4 8.5-12.8 25.6-28.8 DDR3, GDDR5 64 ? 31 No
Radeon HD 6570 650 900 1000 480:24:8 28.8 64 GDDR3 GDDR5 128 ? ? No
Radeon HD 6670 800 1000 480:24:8 64 GDDR5 128 ? 63 No
Radeon HD 6750 720:36:16 up to 73.6 GDDR5 128 16 86 No
Radeon HD 6770 800:40:16 up to 76.8 GDDR5 128 18 108 No
Radeon HD 6850 775 1000 960:48:32 128 GDDR5 256 19 127 No
Radeon HD 6870 900 1050 1120:56:32 134.4 GDDR5 256 19 151 No
Radeon HD 6950 800 1250 1408:88:32 160 GDDR5 256 20 200 563
Radeon HD 6970 880 1375 1536:96:32 176 GDDR5 256 20 250 675
Radeon HD 6990 ? ? 3072:?:? ? GDDR5 2x 256 ? ~300 Yes

As can be seen from table one, GPUs can varied of multiple parameters, which lead to difference in performance. Top-of-the-line model like Radeon HD 6970 is equipped with more cores (PE), wider memory bus bandwidth and faster clock rate. As a result, it is much faster than a low end model with significantly reduced configurations.

According to specification published by AMD [2], Radeon HD GPU organization has significant similarity with OpenCL platform model described above. The similarity can be seen from the figure below.

Figure 3: AMD HD 6900 Series Block Diagram

This is, however, not by chance, but by design as the closeness between the conceptual model and the implementation assists in the development process and improves performance.

NVidia Implementation

The first NVidia GPU generation to support OpenCL 1.1 is GeForce 400 series. Their architecture is shown in the following figure:

Figure 4: NVidia Fermi Architecture [3]

As shown in figure four, NVidia Implementation follows almost the same design, with slightly different variations. Each Core is essentially a PE; which are grouped into Streaming Multiprocessor (SM). Cores have access to two level caches and a register file, similar to AMD’s design. The differences apparently are in terminology and are not fundamental.

Sample Application

OpenCL applications are mainly implemented in C; a C++ wrapper built on top of C is also available. According to the OpenCL 1.1 specification, the OpenCL C language is based on ISO C99, with extensions designed for parallel computing [4]. The following is sample application to compute a Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) from Wikipedia [5]:

// create a compute context with GPU device
context = clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU, NULL, NULL, NULL);

// create a command queue
queue = clCreateCommandQueue(context, NULL, 0, NULL);

// allocate the buffer memory objects
memobjs[0] = clCreateBuffer(context, CL_MEM_READ_ONLY | CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR, sizeof(float)*2*num_entries, srcA, NULL);
memobjs[1] = clCreateBuffer(context, CL_MEM_READ_WRITE, sizeof(float)*2*num_entries, NULL, NULL);

// create the compute program
program = clCreateProgramWithSource(context, 1, &fft1D_1024_kernel_src, NULL, NULL);

// build the compute program executable
clBuildProgram(program, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);

// create the compute kernel
kernel = clCreateKernel(program, "fft1D_1024", NULL);

// set the args values
clSetKernelArg(kernel, 0, sizeof(cl_mem), (void *)&memobjs[0]);
clSetKernelArg(kernel, 1, sizeof(cl_mem), (void *)&memobjs[1]);
clSetKernelArg(kernel, 2, sizeof(float)*(local_work_size[0]+1)*16, NULL);
clSetKernelArg(kernel, 3, sizeof(float)*(local_work_size[0]+1)*16, NULL);

// create N-D range object with work-item dimensions and execute kernel
global_work_size[0] = num_entries;
local_work_size[0] = 64;
clEnqueueNDRangeKernel(queue, kernel, 1, NULL, global_work_size, local_work_size, 0, NULL, NULL);

The compute kernel is specified in the variable fft1D_1024_kernel_src, its source code is provided below:

// This kernel computes FFT of length 1024. The 1024 length FFT is decomposed into
// calls to a radix 16 function, another radix 16 function and then a radix 4 function
__kernel void fft1D_1024 (__global float2 *in, __global float2 *out,
__local float *sMemx, __local float *sMemy) {
int tid = get_local_id(0);
int blockIdx = get_group_id(0) * 1024 + tid;
float2 data[16];

// starting index of data to/from global memory
in = in + blockIdx; out = out + blockIdx;
globalLoads(data, in, 64); // coalesced global reads
fftRadix16Pass(data); // in-place radix-16 pass
twiddleFactorMul(data, tid, 1024, 0);

// local shuffle using local memory
localShuffle(data, sMemx, sMemy, tid, (((tid & 15) * 65) + (tid >> 4)));
fftRadix16Pass(data); // in-place radix-16 pass
twiddleFactorMul(data, tid, 64, 4); // twiddle factor multiplication
localShuffle(data, sMemx, sMemy, tid, (((tid >> 4) * 64) + (tid & 15)));

// four radix-4 function calls
fftRadix4Pass(data); // radix-4 function number 1
fftRadix4Pass(data + 4); // radix-4 function number 2
fftRadix4Pass(data + 8); // radix-4 function number 3
fftRadix4Pass(data + 12); // radix-4 function number 4

// coalesced global writes
globalStores(data, out, 64);
}

As can be seen from the above example, OpenCL C program has a clear control flow. The host program first creates a global share memory area and initializes the environment. It then instructs the driver to compile the compute kernel from OpenCL C source code to machine code specific to the hardware PEs. [2] The compute kernels are then enqueued to run on the Compute Device. When the results are available the host program will be notified. Developing a compute kernel is a relatively straightforward process. Data is first loaded from global memory to local memory. The kernels will then perform computation on this chunk of data. The result will be written back to global memory.

Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA)

CUDA is one of the parallel architectures available to modern GPUs. CUDA a proprietary architecture developed by NVIDIA. CUDA was introduced with NVIDIA’s GeForce 8, February 2007, series of video cards. This architecture gives programmers access to the GPUs multicore processor for performing math intensive operations. These operations include physics modeling (PhysX), physical modeling, image processing, matrix algebra, etc. These GPUs are specifically design to perform many floating point and integer operations simultaneously. CUDA is capable of handling millions of threads simultaneously with little overhead to manage this large number of threads.

CUDA Architecture

Figure 1 shows the typical arrangement on for a GPU multiprocessor. This figure shows the general flow path of data through the GPU. Data flows from the host to the thread execution manager, which spawns and schedules the threads to each stream processor (SP). Each multi-processor, in this figure, contains eight stream processors. Each stream processor has its own memory, texture filter (TF). Each pair of processors has a shared L1 cache. Global memory is a shared memory is shared amongst all the stream processors.

Figure 5: GPU Multiprocessor Arrangement

CUDA Threads

In CUDA programming, serial operations are still handled by the host CPU (main processor) while parallelizable kernels are handed off to the GPU for processing. It is important to understand the layout of the CUDA architecture and memory. Figure 2 shows a simplified block diagram of a typical CUDA thread model

Figure 6: CUDA Thread Model

Each kernel is assigned a grid. Each grid contains a number of blocks. Each block contains threads (512 maximum per block).

CUDA Programming

Programming using CUDA is accomplished via language extensions or wrappers. These extensions are available for a number of common programming langauages such as:

FORTRAN

Java

Ruby

Python

Perl

.NET

MATLAB

Mathematica

Coding using CUDA is fairly straightforward. Listing 1 shows a simple program that will square each value in a matrix.

#include "stdafx.h"

#include <stdio.h>
#include <cuda.h>

// Kernel that executes on the CUDA device

__global__ void square_array(float *a, int N)

{
  int idx = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;

  if (idx<N) a[idx] = a[idx] * a[idx];
}

// main routine that executes on the host
int main(void)
{
  float *a_h, *a_d;  // Pointer to host & device arrays
  const int N = 10;  // Number of elements in arrays

  size_t size = N * sizeof(float);

  a_h = (float *)malloc(size);        // Allocate array on host

  cudaMalloc((void **) &a_d, size);   // Allocate array on device

  // Initialize host array and copy it to CUDA device

  for (int i=0; i<N; i++)
    a_h[i] = (float)i;
  
  cudaMemcpy(a_d, a_h, size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);

  // Do calculation on device:
  int block_size = 4;
  int n_blocks = N/block_size + (N%block_size == 0 ? 0:1);

  square_array <<< n_blocks, block_size >>> (a_d, N);

  // Retrieve result from device and store it in host array
  cudaMemcpy(a_h, a_d, sizeof(float)*N, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);

  // Print results
  for (int i=0; i<N; i++)
    printf("%d %f\n", i, a_h[i]);

  // Cleanup
  free(a_h);

  cudaFree(a_d);
}


References

http://blog.langly.org/2009/11/17/gpu-vs-cpu-cores/

http://llpanorama.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/my-first-cuda-program/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA

http://courses.engr.illinois.edu/ece498/al/