CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2025 - E2536. Improve assessment360 controller
Project Overview
Project Title: Improve assessment360 Controller
Objective
The primary goal is to enhance the UI/UX and code quality of the assessment360 controller. This involves:
- Merging the two existing views (
all_students_all_reviewsandcourse_student_grade_summary) into a single unified view. - Improving the presentation and clarity of data (student grades, peer reviews).
- Refactoring logic for better separation of concerns and maintainability.
- Implementing feedback from the previous team.
Current Implementation Summary
The assessment360 controller exposes two main methods:
all_students_all_reviews: Displays peer review scores per student.course_student_grade_summary: Displays projects and grades for each student.
Limitations noted in previous feedback:
- Separate views instead of a unified dashboard.
- Excessive decimal precision in grade averages.
- Some layout/design issues (e.g., narrow name column).
- Business logic within controllers (should be moved to mixins).
- Sparse code comments.
Planned Enhancements
Functional Changes
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Unified View | Combine both views into a single HTML page that includes both project grades and review scores. |
| Column Selection | Allow users to toggle visible columns using checkboxes. |
| Exclude Unreviewed Assignments | Retain the functionality to exclude unreviewed assignments from averages. |
| Averages Precision | Limit decimal precision to 2 points for clarity. |
| Wider Name Column | Adjust layout to prioritize readability (e.g., wider name column than username). |
Code Refactor
| Task | Reason |
|---|---|
| Move averaging logic to mixins or model concerns | Improve separation of concerns and reusability. |
| Commenting | Add meaningful comments for helper methods and business logic. |
| Query Optimization | Utilize the bullet gem to prevent N+1 queries where applicable.
|
UI/UX Design
The new unified view will feature:
- A tabular layout showing all relevant data.
- Sectioned headers for each student.
- Collapsible panels (if needed) for clarity.
- Visual cues for peer review vs. project grades.
- Responsive design for usability across devices.
Testing Plan
| Test Type | Details |
|---|---|
| Unit Tests | For mixin methods and average calculations. |
| Functional Tests | Using RSpec + Capybara to validate UI behavior. |
| Manual Testing | Validate layout, toggle functionality, and performance. |
Metrics for Success
- Unified view is fully integrated and intuitive.
- UI loads efficiently and scales with data.
- Code coverage is maintained or improved.
- Previous feedback points are addressed.
- PR receives clean review with minimal rework.
Team Information
Mentor: Mitesh Anil Agarwal Team:
- Jap Ashokbhai Purohit - smomin@ncsu.edu
- Sharmeen Momin - smomin@ncsu.edu
- Prithish Samanta - psamant2@ncsu.edu