CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2023 - E2383. Grading Audit Trail
Introduction
Problem Statement
After an instructor gave a grade to an assignment, there is no way to track who gave the grade. A grading audit trail must be created and the following information needs to be stored:
- 1. When a grade is assigned by an instructor, there needs to be an indication of who did it and when it was done.
- 2. Comments previously provided by other instructors must also be preserved.
This information needs to be stored every time an instructor edits a grade/comment and clicks the save button.
Overview of Major Changes By Previous Teams
E1934
- A new table was added to the database (grading_history), along with the corresponding model (grading_history.rb) and controller (grading_history_controller.rb).
- Whenever an instructor submits a new grade, or edits an existing grade, the grading_history_controller saves a new history entry to the database.
- Two models for specific types of histories were added: review_grading_history.rb, and submission_grading_history.rb.
- A view for displaying the grading history of a particular assignment or review was added (grading_histories/index.html.erb).
Problems/Issues
- For review grades, the “Grading History” link must not be in a separate column. It should be in smaller text below the in the “Save” button.
- In the view grading record page, remove the receiver column and add it to the title
- Restrict the column width on the grading record page
- Add comments on list_submissions.html.erb to indicate that the alignment was changed to fix code climate issues
- Ensure that white space changes are separate commits
- Revert changes made to list_review_mapping.html.erb 7. Remove the review_report-html.erb file *Design doc – mention why each of those files were changed
E2158
- They attempted to solve the previous issues of E1934
E2237
- They fixed some issues that were causing the system to crash during testing
- Altered the Grading History view
- Explained the reasoning for changes made to files using diagrams and justifications
Problems/Issues
- Redundant files generated by scaffolding need to be removed, along with debugging code.
- Authentication could be done using existing utilities, no need to create your own.
- Some formatting changes could be done especially on how cells span in review report page.
- Code from previous implementation is a concern.
Proposed Solution
Relevant Links
- Github Repository: https://github.com/ErikLG360/expertiza
- Pull Request: https://github.com/expertiza/expertiza/pull/2696
- VCL Server: NOT Setup yet
Contributors to this project
- Amulya Usem
- Erik Lopez-Godinez
- Gowtham Pollam
- Mentor: Srilekha Gudipati