CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2016 / Expertiza Self-Review Feature

CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2016/oss E1600

This page will discuss the newly added peer self review feature that was added to the Expertiza project.

Background

Developed by both students and faculty at North Carolina State University, Expertiza is a educational based web application that allows to students to peer review other student's work. In Expertiza, instructors are in charge of courses and within each course, they may create a series of assignments for students to contribute to, either as a member of a team or individually. Students or Teams may submit their assignments to the system through multiple means including file uploads and embedded links. Then assignments may become available to peer review by other members of the course, which provides a way to crowd-source grading on the work.

Problem Statement

Expertiza previously contained a self-review feature where student's were able to review their own work after submitting their assignments but it was removed due to the inconsistency with the other types of reviews. The task was to re-implement the feature in a way that ensured the overall design would remain intact. The self-review feature should allow students to review their own submission using the same rubric that was provided to other peer reviewers of the assignment. By reviewing their own work, students will be able to assess the artifact through the rubric and may be inspired to make improvements between rounds of peer-reviews.

What Needs Done:

The following tasks were given to be completed by the team:

• The self-review feature should use the same questionnaire_id as a peer-review. That way developers may call "assignment.get_review_questionnaire_id(round)" to get a questionnaire for the self-review.
• A method called "self_review_response_map?" should be added to review_response_map.rb. The method will return true if the response_map is a self_response map. In order to determine the result the method shall compare the reviewer_id and reviewee_id in the response_map record and if the participant is a member of the reviewee team, true will be returned.
• Student shall do a self-review in the "your work" section. There should be a button called "Review my own work" (or "our own work" if it is a team assignment). When the button is clicked a new review_response_map record is created. Within the map, the reviewer_id is the participant id and the reviewee_id is the team_id.
• If the response_map record for self-review exists, a hyperlink with the text "begin" should appear. A student may click the link and fill in the questionnaire just like how they would for a regular peer review.
• If the self-review response_map exists and there has already been a response, two links entitled "view" and "edit" will appear that will function similarly to peer reviews.
• If the self-review was completed in the last round and the current round uses a different questionnaire (using the vary_rubric_by_round feature), a link called "update" will appear, which brings students to a new page to fill in the new rubric for the new round.
• In grades_controller.view_my_scores, self-review responses shall be excluded.
• In grades_controller.view_team, self-review responses shall be excluded.
• In grades_controller.view, self-review responses shall be excluded.
• The method called "add_self_reviewer" in ReviewMappingController, shall allow instructors to create self-review response maps. This method needs to be made functional again.
• Automated tests must be created.

Files Modified in Project

The following files were modified in creating the new self-review feature

• review_response_map.rb
• review_mapping_controller.rb
• response_controller.rb
• _set_dynamic_review.html.erb
• _main.html.erb
• _general.html.erb
• response.html.erb
• routes.rb

The following files were created:

• self_review_response_map.rb
• _self_review.html.erb
• 20160321221146_add_columnselfreviewenabled.rb

The following test classes were created:

• self_review_response_maps.rb
• self_review_response_map_test.rb

Walkthrough

Below are walkthroughs that will guide users through the new functionality included in the update.

Instructor Perspective

When creating a new assignment, an instructor will have an option to enable self-reviews. In order to allow for self-reviews to be completed, the instructor must check the box while either creating or editing the assignment.

Student Perspective

If self-reviews are available on an assignment the following will be available for students to use.

1. During the beginning stages of an assignment under "your work" the User Interface will show a label called Self-Review and a button which reads "Review my/our own work" (depending on whether it is an individual or team assignment). 2. After selecting "Review my/our own work" the button will change to "Begin" (just like how a peer review works). 3. Once the user selects "Begin" they will be taken to a questionnaire to complete. The questionnaire is the same one that a peer reviewer would complete. 4. Similarly to a peer review, a user may either "Save" or "Submit" their self-review. 5. After a user saves a self-review, "View" and "Edit" links will appear. However, once a user submits their self-review, they will be unable to edit the peer review. 6. If there are multiple rounds of submissions and reviews, then in all following rounds an update link will appear to allow for students to update their self-review. 7. If late submissions are allowed (via Expertiza "submission allowed" flag) then a user may begin and submit self reviews even in other review stages. 8. If a self-review is not submitted throughout the duration of the assignment then "Work yet to be submitted" will be shown. 9. Scores from self-reviews will not be considered when calculating grades throughout the assignment.