Talk:Social dossiers

• <I'm not sure what is meant by this???>There should be a link to the topic description.
• <Corrected: 16+>There need to be more links, perhaps two dozen instead of one dozen. (was having difficulty finding quality articles that were not duplicates of existing stories...)
• <Corrected: added more discussion>{identification of issues} Some, e.g., use in hiring. But the study guide says very little about it; you have to follow the links.
• <Corrected: incorporated into discussion>Differing viewpoints are not really identified, unless you read the articles linked to.
• <Corrected: revised link categories>"Articles of interest" is too vague; one of the headings should certainly be "Job Hunting"
• {identification of issues} It probably mentions them somewhere, but does not really identify them as ethical issues.

• <Corrected>The study guide does not read as a narrative, but rather as a set of related paragraphs. There should be topic sentences, explaining why lists of issues have been aggregated together.