CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2015/oss E1503 RSA

From Expertiza_Wiki
Revision as of 20:28, 22 March 2015 by Rkyadav (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E1503. Refactor Leaderboard model, Leaderboard_helper and LeaderboardController classes

This page provides a description of the Expertiza based OSS project. This project aimed at refactoring the Leaderboard model, LeaderboardController, and Leaderboard_helper classes as per standard coding methodology for Ruby on Rails.

Introduction to Expertiza

Expertiza is a peer review based system used to provide improved learning experience. Project is developed as a combined effort of students and faculty using the Ruby on Rails framework. Expertiza allows the instructor to create and customize assignments, create a list of topics the students can sign up for, have students work on teams and then review each other's assignments at the end. Expertiza supports submission of almost any document type, including the URLs and wiki pages.

Leaderboard is a module that can be used to find top three leaders in any class based on the score they have received on their submissions and reviews.


Problem Statement

Classes involved:

bookmark.rb
bmapping.rb
bookmarks_controller.rb
auth_controller.rb
auth_helper.rb

What they do: The bookmark model and controller help in creating user specific bookmarks, which can be added to topics. Also, they provide the functionality to edit these bookmarks by the created user. User can search bookmarks by either users who created them or the bookmark tags.

What needs to be done: The search methods in bookmarks model are being used used in a very granular level. This led to redundancy in bookmarks search methods. These methods include search_alltags_allusers, search_fortags_allusers, search_fortags_forusers, search_alltags_forusers. Hence duplicacies in these methods are to be singled out. As we know, in ruby, the method name should specify the pseudo use of itself. Here, add_new_bookmark misleads as this is one of the CRUB method and the naming convention is not quite right. It has to be renamed to create method. Again the case of duplicates arrive. Now in the methods add_topic_bookmark, add_this_bookmark, add_bookmark . The difference between add_topic_bookmark and add_this_bookmark is that the former takes an extra input i.e. topicid. Hence these two can be moved into one method. The third method is an unnecessary repetition of the former two methods' functionality. The method name edit_this_bookmark should be renamed to edit along with updating all the dependencies corresponding to edit_this_bookmark .Lastly, add_bmapping and add_bmapping_signuptopic have to be moved to appropriate class i.e. bmapping class. This involves checking their dependencies and updating their function calls accordingly.

Changes Made

Bookmark Model

Method Name Changes Made Reason For Change
add_this_bookmark Added functionality of add_topic_bookmark To implement code reusability and remove repetitive code.
add_topic_bookmark Merged the functionality into add_this_bookmarks and deleted add_topic_bookmark To implement code reusability and remove repetitive code.
add_bookmark Added a line that checks whether topic_id has been provided in the request It allows creation of new Bmapping if no topic_id was given and removes the bug of searching for bookmark with nil topic_id later on
search_alltags_allusers -------------- ---------
search_alltags_foruser -------------- ---------
search_fortags_allusers -------------- ---------
search_fortags_foruser -------------- ---------
add_new_bookmark Changed the method name to "create" It is a much more meaningful and simpler name for a method that creates a new bookmark
edit_this_bookmark Changed the name to "edit" It is a much more appropriate name for a method that edits the bookmark it was called on
add_bmapping -------------- ---------
add_bmapping_signuptopic -------------- ---------

Bookmark Controller

Method Name Changes Made Reason For Change
create ---------------- -----------
update ----------------- --------
edit -------------- ---------

destroy

----------------- ---------
--------------- ----------
---------- ----------

Views

Method Name Changes Made Reason For Change
bookmarks/_result.html.erb ---------------- -----------
bookmarks/search_bookmarks.html.erb ----------------- --------
bookmarks/view_bookmarks.html.erb -------------- ---------
bookmarks/_searchmine.html.erb ----------------- ---------
bookmarks/add_bookmark_form.html.erb ----------------- ---------
bookmarks/edit_bookmark_form.html.erb ----------------- ---------
bookmarks/managing_bookmarks.html.erb ----------------- ---------
layouts/application.html.erb ----------------- ---------

Re-factored Code Cases

Case 1 : Refactoring add_this_bookmark and add_topic_bookmark

The consistency of these two methods shows plenty of repetitive code. In order to effectively refactor these methods and reuse the code they both need, our team merged the two methods together by enabling add_this_bookmark method to handle creation of a bookmark when a topic id is provided (main functionality of add_topic_bookmark method). Once we implemented this change on add_this_bookmark method, we deleted add_topic_bookmark method as it became obsolete. Therefore, we retained the same functionality while reducing the method by 7 repetitive lines of code.

Before Changes

  def self.add_topic_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user, topicid)
    # Check if the bookmark exists and add / edit based on that
    bookmark_exists = check_bookmark_exists(b_url)
    bmapping_exists = check_bmapping_exists(b_url,session_user)
    if (!bookmark_exists || !bmapping_exists)
      Bookmark.add_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user,topicid)
    elsif (bmapping_exists)
      Bookmark.edit_this_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user)
    end
  end

  def self.add_this_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user)
    bookmark_exists = check_bookmark_exists(b_url)
    bmapping_exists = check_bmapping_exists(b_url,session_user)
    if (!bookmark_exists || !bmapping_exists)
      Bookmark.add_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user)
    elsif (bmapping_exists)
      Bookmark.edit_this_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user)
    end
  end

After Changes

  def self.add_this_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user, topic_id)
    bookmark_exists = check_bookmark_exists(b_url)
    bmapping_exists = check_bmapping_exists(b_url,session_user)
    if (!bookmark_exists || !bmapping_exists)
      if(topic_id) # something has been passed for topic_id
        Bookmark.add_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user,topic_id)
      else
        Bookmark.add_bookmark(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user, nil)
      end
    elsif (bmapping_exists)
      Bookmark.edit(b_url, b_title, b_tags_text, b_description,session_user)
    end
  end

Case 2 :

Steps to verify changes manually

User2 Role

Automated Tests

Unit test

Integration (Cucumber) tests

See Also

References