CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2015/ch1a 6 TZ
Snap CI
Snap CI is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery service.
Background
Continuous integration (CI) is the practice of merging all developer working copies with a shared mainline several times a day. It was adopted as part of extreme programming (XP). The main aim of CI is to prevent integration problems, referred to as "integration hell" in early descriptions of XP.
CI was originally intended to be used in combination with automated unit tests written through the practices of test-driven development (TDD). Initially this was conceived of as running all unit tests in the developer's local environment and verifying they all passed before committing to the mainline. This helps avoid one developer's work in progress breaking another developer's copy.
Later elaborations of the concept introduced build servers, which automatically run the unit tests periodically or even after every commit and report the results to the developers. The use of build servers (not necessarily running unit tests) had already been practised by some teams outside the XP community. Nowadays, many organisations have adopted CI without adopting all of XP.
In addition to automated unit tests, organisations using CI typically use a build server to implement continuous processes of applying quality control in general — small pieces of effort, applied frequently. In addition to running the unit and integration tests, such processes run additional static and dynamic tests, measure and profile performance, extract and format documentation from the source code and facilitate manual QA processes. This continuous application of quality control aims to improve the quality of software, and to reduce the time taken to deliver it, by replacing the traditional practice of applying quality control after completing all development. This is very similar to the original idea of integrating more frequently to make integration easier, only applied to QA processes.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration</ref>
Example
Getting started on Snap CI.
Step1: Sign in
To sign up with Snap, visit Snap CI and click in the Sign in with Github link at the top. When you sign in, GitHub will ask if you want to give a set of permissions to Snap.
Step2: Add your repository
Once you are signed in, Snap will present a list of all the repositories you have access to. You may only build repositories. If you are an administrator on any of those repositories, you may build that repository on Snap.
Step3: Config your build
When you select a repository to build on Snap, we will attempt to automatically detect some popular configurations for your build. We look for languages versions, build tools files, dependency managers and other conventions that may indicate how your build could be set up. In this guide we'll use a ruby repository, but we do support lots of other languages.
As most of the ruby repositories, this one uses a dependency manager tool call bundler and the rspec testing framework. Because of that, Snap automatically added the default command for each of them: bundle install --path ${SNAP_CACHE_DIR}/.bundle and rake spec respectively. Most of the times that would be everything needed to run your tests. However, there may be some tasks that are pre-requisites to it. In this specific build, we need to execute the command bundle exec foreman start &. It can be done simply by adding it before bundle exec rake spec.<ref>https://docs.snap-ci.com/getting-started/</ref>
Step4: Build
All that's left to do is click Build now and let Snap run our build.
Compare Different Continuous Intergration Tools
Common Continguous Intergration Tools
There are more than 30 continuous intergration tools designed to adapt to different platforms. I select several tools which can connect Github and relate to Ruby to compare.
| Name | Platform | License | Windows builders | Java builders | Other builders | Notification | IDE Integration | Other Integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CircleCI | Hosted | proprietary | unknown | unknown | Ruby, Python, Node.js, PHP, Java | E-mail, Campfire, HipChat, CCtray | unknown | Heroku, GitHub |
| node.ci | Hosted | proprietary | unknown | unknown | Node.js | unknown | Amazon Web Services(AWS), GitHub, Bitbucket | |
| Codeship | Hosted | proprietary | no | Maven | Go , Java , Node.js, PHP, Python , Ruby | E-mail, Flowdock, Grove, HipChat, Web | no | CloudControl, Engine Yard, GitHub, Heroku |
| Continua CI | Windows | proprietary | Ant, Nant, FinalBuilder, MSBuild, Rake, Visual Studio, Powershell | Ant | Execute Program(command line) | E-mail, XMPP | no | GitHub, Bitbucket, Codeplex, Kiln, Team Foundation Server(TFS), FogBugz, Jira, NCover, Opencover, NUnit, DUnitX, jUnit, xUnit, NuGet, 7Zip |
| Drone.io | Hosted | Apache 2.0 | unknown | Ant, Apache Maven|Maven 2, Gradle | C, C++, Dart, Go, Node.js, Python, PHP, Ruby, Java, Groovy, Scala, Erlang | unknown | Heroku, Dotcloud, GitHub, Bitbucket | |
| Koality | Cross Platform, Private Cloud | proprietary | unknown | unknown | Command-Line | Email, HipChat, GitHub | unknown | Amazon Web Services, GitHub |
| Semaphore | Hosted | proprietary | unknown | Apache Maven 3 | Ruby , Java , Node.js, PHP, Clojure, Rake, Command Line | E-mail, Campfire, HipChat, Slack, Flowdock, Webhooks, Remote API | unknown | GitHub, Bitbucket, Heroku, Code Climate, Cloud 66 |
| Shippable | Hosted | proprietary | MSBuild, NAnt | Apache Ant, Apache Maven, Gradle | Ruby, Python, Node.js, Java, Scala, C Sharp, PHP, Go | E-mail, Campfire | no | GitHub, Bitbucket Heroku |
| Snap CI | Hosted | proprietary | no | Apache Ant, Apache Maven, Gradle, Android | C, C++, Clojure, Erlang, Go, Groovy, Haskell, Java, Node.js, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Scala | E-Mail, Campfire, HipChat, Webhook | no | AWS |
| Solano CI | Private Cloud | proprietary | no | Apache Ant, Apache Maven, Gradle | C, C++, Clojure, Go, Java, Javascript, Node.js, PHP, Python, R, Ruby, Scala, Command Line | E-Mail, Campfire, HipChat, Flowdock, Slack, Webhook, CCMenu | no | GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Bitbucket, Heroku, Amazon Web Services(AWS), Git, Mercurial |
| Strider | Node.js | freeBSD | no | no | C, C++, Clojure, Erlang, Go, Groovy, Haskell, Java, Node.js, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Scala | no | GitHub, Bitbucket, Heroku, GitHub Enterprise, Git | |
| Travis CI | Hosted | MIT | no | Apache Ant, Apache Maven, Gradle | C, C++, Clojure, Erlang, Go, Groovy, Haskell, Java, Node.js, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Scala | E-Mail, Campfire, HipChat, IRC, Slack | no | GitHub, Heroku |
Snap CI vs. Other Tools
Different Endpoints
Many Continuous Integration(CI) tools has this feature, that is, building and running tests when a change happens. However, Snap augments this with the idea of a Deployment Pipeline as stated on Part II of the Continuous Delivery.
What this means is while most Continuous Integration tools consider CI to be the endpoint (or maybe allow you to configure an automatic deployment), running tests is but the start of the journey in Snap.
Continuous Integration - The automated build and test of your software when a change is made by anyone on the team, with all work happening on a shared branch. Continuous Delivery - The ability to keep your software shippable at any time. Have a rigorous set of automated tests and robust deployment scripts and tools.
Stages
Stages are a set of logically related commands. To confidently say that your software is production ready, you need to look it at from multiple different angles. Unit tests, code formatting, functional tests, security checks, performance tests and so on. On more advanced projects, this might also include deployment of the software to testing environments and the execution of either automatic or manual tests against these deployed testing environments. Stages model each of these activities. Your software goes through these stages, one by one, and can be considered “good for production” when it pass all of them. On the flip side, when a stage fails, it reveals that an aspect of the software’s quality has failed its test for production readiness. When a stage fails, the pipeline is stopped and the team members are notified about the failure. Since there is a logical organization of these steps, when one fails, the team can quickly identify in which set of commands the failure has happened. This results in much faster feedback than would otherwise be possible.
The ability to organize these automation steps allows you to separate different concerns when preparing your software to be deployed to production. Snap’s support for deployment pipeline lets you create stages and also shows exactly how far each set of changes made it down the pipeline.
Narration
Conclusion
References
<references/>