CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2013/ch1 1w08 cc: Difference between revisions
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
== Features == | == Features == | ||
This compares the tools based on the most common and valuable features for a collaborative code review tool. | |||
"*" denotes a feature. | "*" denotes a feature. | ||
{| style="width: 60%; height = 100px;" | {| style="width: 60%; height = 100px;" |
Revision as of 18:16, 18 September 2013
Code review tools are used to aid and automate existing peer code review practices in order to simplify and guide the review work flow. In general, code review is a systematic analysis of source code by a peer to find bugs which may have been missed by the original coder. <ref> GoogleTalksArchive "Mondrian Code Review on the Web" </ref>. The code review tools discussed here are collaborative tools designed for multiple users to easily share, review, and comment on one another's code to speed up the debugging process. Key features of code review tools include email notifications, syntax highlighted color diffs, commenting, reports, and subversion integration.
Code Review Tools
There are many code review tools in use today. Which tools one chooses to use depends on the individual needs since every tool is different. Below are some popular code review tools in use today along with their background and features.
Agile Review
Agile Review is an open source code review tool that is an Eclipse Plugin. <ref>Agile Review [1]</ref>
Cost: Free
Features
- Refactoring Safety
- Highlighted Comments
- SCM (Source Control Management) Integration
Barkeep
Barkeep is a code review system developed in Ruby by the company Ooyala <ref> GitHub "Comparing barkeep to other code review tools" </ref>. Although written in Ruby Barkeep is not language specific and may be used for code review of any language. Barkeep is standalone and the end user is responsible for hosting it. One of the key features that Barkeep prides itself on is it hackable nature. Since Barkeep is hosted by the user and they provide their “small codebase” it allows users to add on new features and make modifications as they see fit for their needs. So even if Barkeep doesn’t have a feature someone needs it is very feasible for the user to add it.
Cost: Free
Features
- Email Notifications
- Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs
- Hackable
- Commits Searching
- Review Requests
- Comments
- Inline Code Snippets
- Stats
- Most Active Reviewers
- Most Commented Commits
- Review Coverage
- Top Approvers
Collaborator
Collaborator is a code review tool built on CodeCollaborator by SmartBear. Unlike many other code review tools collaborator also doubles as a peer review tool allowing review of not only code but documents and other project deliverables such as user stories, test plans and user documentation. Companies such as Intel, Southwest Airlines, Cisco and Walmart have used Collaborator. <ref> SmartBear "Code & Document Review - Collaborator" </ref>
Cost: Paid
Features
- Real-time Chat
- Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs
- Comments
- IDE & SCM (Source Control Management) Integrations
- Reports
- Pending Code Reviews
- Code Review Performance
- Many more…
- Customizable and Automated Workflows
- Defect Tracking & Management
- Review Checklists
Code Striker
Code Stricker is a collaborative code reviewing web application written in cross-platform Perl. Code Stricker is open source and located on Sourceforge.<ref>Sourceforge "What is Codestriker?"</ref>
Cost: Free
Features
- Email Notifications
- Commenting
- Per-line Comments
- SCM (Source Control Management) Integration
- Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs
- Bug Tracking System Integration
Crucible
Crucible is collaborative peer code review software developed by Atlassian. Crucible is a proprietary and primarily used by enterprise teams. <ref> Atlassian "Crucible Documentation Home"</ref> Customers of Crucible include ESPN, Cosco, Twitter, Visa and UPS. Unlike most other code review tools since Crucible is developed by Atlassian who makes many other software tools it integrates well with the other tools providing additional functionality above the typical code review tool. This includes Crucible's functionality to allow code review actions to be turned into defects using Atlassian's defect tracking system, JIRA. Crucible is the code review tool of choice for many large software companies. <ref> Atlassian "Crucible" </ref>
Cost: Paid
Features
- Commenting
- Threaded Inline Discussions
- Iterative Reviews
- Auditing of Review Activity
- Email and RSS Notifications
- Support to Review code before Check-In
- Review Reminders
- Dashboard & Reporting
- Review Coverage Reports
- Activity Streams
- Progress Indicators
- Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs
- SCM (Source Control Management) Integration
Gerrit
Gerrit is a web based code review tool. Gerrit started off at Google as a some simples fixes to the code review tool, Rietveld. Shortly after it's creation it became a fork of Rietveld and a eventually a separate project from Rietveld which needed a seperate name, Gerrit. When Gerrit first came into existence it was developed in Python like Rietveld. Gerrit2 which is in use today is a rewrite of the original Gerrit in Java. <ref>Google Code "Background - The history behind Gerrit Code Review"</ref>
Cost: Free
Features
- Git Integration
- Side-by-Side File Comparison
- Commenting
- Inline Comments
Groogle
Groogle is an open source collaborative code review tool which is available as a cross-platform web interface <ref> Groogle "About Groogle"</ref>. The distinct value of the tool is its ability to adapt to and enforce existing workflows rather than making workflows adapt to the code review tool <ref> sourceforge.net "Groogle: A sensible source code review tool" </ref>. The customization factor makes it extremely user friendly.
Cost: Free
Features: <ref> Groogle "About Groogle"</ref>
- Cross-platform Web app
- SCM (Source Control Management) Integration
- File upload support for formats: zip, tar, gzip, and bzip2
- Pre/Post commit support
- 100 language syntax highlighting
- Syntax highlighting color diffs
- Repository tree change comparison
- Email notifications
- Asynchronous repository checkouts
- Security features
JCR - Java Code Reviewer
JCR is a web app for collaborative code reviews. It is available for reviews of any source code language, but it is especially useful for Java <ref> JCR "Java Code Reviewer" </ref>
Cost: Free
Features: <ref> JCR "Java Code Reviewer" </ref>
- Syntax-highlighted
- Changes highlighted
- Code extracts shown with comments for context
- Status reports
Jupiter
Jupiter is an open source plugin for Eclipse, and therefore available for all platforms that support Eclipse. <ref> "jupiter-eclipse-plugin" </ref> It does not have as many features as other tools, but it is open for development by all.
Cost: Free
Features:
- Reviews Sorting
- Switch quickly between source code and review files
- Individual and Team views
Malevich
Perforce
Rietveld
Rietveld is an open source web application for code reviews. Rietveld was inspired by Mondrian a internal web application at Google used for code reviews. Mondrian is heavily used inside Google and a developer of Mondrian always wanted to release it as an open source tool but due to its popularity within the company was unable to. Rietveld came about from the inspiration of Mondrian and was released to the open source Python community. <ref>Google Developers "An Open Source App: Rietveld Code Review Tool" </ref>
Cost: Free
Features
- Email Notifications
- Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs
- Hackable
- Inline Comment
Review Board
Review Board is a free web-based code review tool which was originally developed by Christian Hammond and David Trowbridge from VMWare <ref> Gavin Terrill "Review Board - Online Code Review Tool". Feb 12, 2008 </ref>. It focuses on combining everything needed for a code review to a central dashboard, and using emails as only the notification system instead of the full support for passing code between users. <ref> Jake Edge "Making code reviews easier with Review Board" January 16, 2008 </ref>
Cost: Free
Features: <ref> Review Board[2] </ref>
- Track review requests
- Syntax-highlighted color diffs
- Inter-revision diff
- Diff any file, not only source code
- Commenting on multiple lines
- Open item to-do list
- Development history
- Extensible
Comparison
Functionality
Developer | Maintainer | License | Developed In | Available For | Desktop Client vs Web App | Cost | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agile Review | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Open Source | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Desktop Client (Eclipse) | Free |
Barkeep | Ooyala | Ooyala | Open Source | Ruby | Cell 6 | Web Application | Free |
Collaborator | SmartBear | SmartBear | Proprietary | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Desktop Client | Paid |
Code Striker | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Open Source | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Web Application | Free |
Crucible | Atlassian | Atlassian | Proprietary | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Web Application | Paid |
Gerrit | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Java | Cell 6 | Web Application | Free |
Groogle | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Web Application | Cell 8 |
JCode Review | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Cell 7 | Cell 8 |
Jupiter | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Cell 7 | Cell 8 |
Malevich | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Cell 7 | Cell 8 |
Perforce | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Cell 7 | Cell 8 |
Rietveld | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Python | Cell 6 | Cell 7 | Free |
Review Board | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 | Web Application | Cell 8 |
Features
This compares the tools based on the most common and valuable features for a collaborative code review tool. "*" denotes a feature.
Syntax Highlighted Color Diffs | Email Notifications | Commenting | SCM Integration | Side-by-Side File Comparison | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agile Review | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Barkeep | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Collaborator | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Code Striker | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Crucible | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Gerrit | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Groogle | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
JCode Review | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Jupiter | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Malevich | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Perforce | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Rietveld | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
Review Board | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | Cell 6 |
References
<references/>