Talk:CSC 456 Fall 2013/1d vb: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Here are some suggestions for improving your page. * Another limitation on pipeline depth is the overhead of latching, which is needed at the end of each stage, so partial resul...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Another limitation on pipeline depth is the overhead of latching, which is needed at the end of each stage, so partial results can be "pulsed" to the next stage. | * Another limitation on pipeline depth is the overhead of latching, which is needed at the end of each stage, so partial results can be "pulsed" to the next stage. | ||
* I did a Google Scholar search on "pipeline depth". An alternative is to search both the ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore. | |||
* Power is another consideration; see http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=956566. | |||
* It is important not just to give the results, but to explain how and why the authors have reached the conclusions that they did. | |||
* The first several hits for this topic are from 2002-2003. Earlier work by Kunkel and Smith from 1997 is also worth citing, to show how the situation changed during the intervening years. I find later papers on the IBM Cell processor, about 2005. Then there are several references related to power from about 2008. | |||
* In addition to theoretical and simulation results, it would also be good to look at trade publications for pipeline depths of widely used processors over the years. |
Revision as of 14:08, 10 September 2013
Here are some suggestions for improving your page.
- Another limitation on pipeline depth is the overhead of latching, which is needed at the end of each stage, so partial results can be "pulsed" to the next stage.
- I did a Google Scholar search on "pipeline depth". An alternative is to search both the ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore.
- Power is another consideration; see http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=956566.
- It is important not just to give the results, but to explain how and why the authors have reached the conclusions that they did.
- The first several hits for this topic are from 2002-2003. Earlier work by Kunkel and Smith from 1997 is also worth citing, to show how the situation changed during the intervening years. I find later papers on the IBM Cell processor, about 2005. Then there are several references related to power from about 2008.
- In addition to theoretical and simulation results, it would also be good to look at trade publications for pipeline depths of widely used processors over the years.