CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2012/ch2b 2w59 bc: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


==Java & C#==
==Java & C#==
==Directory==
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern Wikipedia - Decorator Pattern]
**Pro: Provides background, motivation and a good overview of the pattern, as well as some high level examples.
**Con: Wikipedia can be fairly difficult to follow sometimes and this article is not much of an exception (also, Wikipedia's credibility is debated).
*[http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dofactory.com%2FPatterns%2FPatternDecorator.aspx&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGFh9wp9H2FSxI5drUZfg4YE-Au3g dofactory - Decorator Design Pattern]
**Pro: Provides a quick definition, list of participants and abstract UML diagram.
**Con: Not much of an explanation - just good for referencing.
*[http://javapapers.com/design-patterns/decorator-pattern/ javapapers - Decorator Design Pattern (Java)]
**Pro: Provides a short overview of the pattern as well as a good concrete example with UML and Java code.
**Con: The concrete example is a good start, but it may not be real-world enough to provide a complete understand.
*[https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Foreilly.com%2Fcatalog%2Fhfdesignpat%2Fchapter%2Fch03.pdf Head First Design Patterns]
**Pro: Is a excerpt from a commercial textbook, so the source is extremely credible and provides an in depth explanation of the design pattern complete with UML and a concrete example.
**Con: The textbook does not appear too professional and provides a lot of background that isn't really necessary for understanding the pattern. This is very long read.


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 20:04, 16 November 2012

Decorator Directory

General Resources

Description of the Pattern

Wikipedia<ref name="wikipedia">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMV7nOiTwXw - 2012</ref> and dofactory<ref name="dofactory">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMV7nOiTwXw - 2012</ref> provide solid explanations of the Decorator Pattern. dofactory<ref name="dofactory"/> is much more concise than Wikipedia<ref name="wikipedia"/>. It is a good resource for quickly viewing the definition and participants of the pattern. Wikipedia<ref name="wikipedia"/>, on the other hand, is much more verbose, but goes into the motivation for the pattern and talks use of the patterns in several languages at a high level.

UML

Wikipedia<ref name="wikipedia"/> and dofactory<ref name="dofactory"/> both provide UML diagrams of the Decorator Pattern concept. For UML diagrams of concrete examples, javapapers<ref name="javapapers">http://javapapers.com/design-patterns/decorator-pattern/</ref> provides an Ice Cream example and Head First Design Patterns<ref name="head_first">https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Foreilly.com%2Fcatalog%2Fhfdesignpat%2Fchapter%2Fch03.pdf</ref> provides a couple as well, but it is a very long read. Many of the language specific resources listed later in this article also provide UML diagrams for their concrete examples/implementations.

Ruby

Java & C#

Directory

  • Wikipedia - Decorator Pattern
    • Pro: Provides background, motivation and a good overview of the pattern, as well as some high level examples.
    • Con: Wikipedia can be fairly difficult to follow sometimes and this article is not much of an exception (also, Wikipedia's credibility is debated).
  • dofactory - Decorator Design Pattern
    • Pro: Provides a quick definition, list of participants and abstract UML diagram.
    • Con: Not much of an explanation - just good for referencing.
  • javapapers - Decorator Design Pattern (Java)
    • Pro: Provides a short overview of the pattern as well as a good concrete example with UML and Java code.
    • Con: The concrete example is a good start, but it may not be real-world enough to provide a complete understand.
  • Head First Design Patterns
    • Pro: Is a excerpt from a commercial textbook, so the source is extremely credible and provides an in depth explanation of the design pattern complete with UML and a concrete example.
    • Con: The textbook does not appear too professional and provides a lot of background that isn't really necessary for understanding the pattern. This is very long read.

References

<references/>