CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki2 2 d4: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Object Relational Mapping (ORM) == | == Object Relational Mapping (ORM) == | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Relational_Mapping Object-relational mapping] (ORM) is the technique used to marshal database records into classes of object-oriented ( | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_Relational_Mapping Object-relational mapping] (ORM) is the technique used to marshal database records into classes of object-oriented (o-o) languages and vice-versa. The technique is usually developed into a tool that can be used by the developer to alleviate some of the complexity in this mapping. The complexity derives from the inherently different data types that are used by relational databases and o-o languages. Database data types are typically scalar in nature while classes are more typically composed of a mix of non-scalar and scalar types. | ||
[[Image:ORM_Flowchart.jpg]] | [[Image:ORM_Flowchart.jpg]] | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== Crossing the Chasm Pattern Language === | === Crossing the Chasm Pattern Language === | ||
One of the [http://www.agiledata.org/essays/mappingObjects.html first ORMs], the name implies the difficulty involved in mapping between the two disjoint data structures. | |||
== Active Record == | == Active Record == |
Revision as of 12:23, 23 October 2007
Topic
Object-relational mapping. Ruby's ActiveRecord is one attempt to allow an object-oriented program to use a relational database. The Crossing Chasms pattern is another. Look up several approaches to mapping relational databases to o-o programs, include hyperlinks to all of them, and explain how they differ. Report on the strengths of various approaches (making sure to credit the authors for their insights)
Object Relational Mapping (ORM)
Object-relational mapping (ORM) is the technique used to marshal database records into classes of object-oriented (o-o) languages and vice-versa. The technique is usually developed into a tool that can be used by the developer to alleviate some of the complexity in this mapping. The complexity derives from the inherently different data types that are used by relational databases and o-o languages. Database data types are typically scalar in nature while classes are more typically composed of a mix of non-scalar and scalar types.
Why these techniques are necessary?
- There is not a one-to-one relationship between database object types and O-O language types
Definition
Need
Approaches
Popular Approaches
Crossing the Chasm Pattern Language
One of the first ORMs, the name implies the difficulty involved in mapping between the two disjoint data structures.
Active Record
Limitations
- No Foreign Key Support: Although RoR lets you define has_many relationships, it makes no effort to create foreign key constraints in the underlying database to ensure relational integrity.
- No Multi-column Primary Key Support: Multi-column primary keys are a staple of relational database schema definition.
Data Mapper
Lafcadio
- Another ORM for Ruby that currently only supports MySQL databases
- Treats each table row as a class object
- see http://lafcadio.rubyforge.org/ and http://www.zenspider.com/dl/rubyconf2003/lafcadio.pdf
Popular Products
These patterns in practice can be found in
Hibernate
Oslick