Talk:KCU/03/King Pins: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm | http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm | ||
http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/seamands/general.htm |
Revision as of 17:09, 2 October 2007
Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft
As a first draft, your contribution falls short. You do have some good paragraphs put together. You are lacking detailed evidence & dialog partners from extra research. If this were the final draft, it would not pass. But this is not the final draft, so you're OK. You actually do have some good paragraphs to build on. So, you did OK for now.
1. For each of your paragraphs & points, you can improve by bringing in dialog partners from extra research
2. You will profit from bringing all relevant scriptures into the discussion
3. You will want to bring in technical commentaries on those scriptures. The following commentary series are the most likely to be helpful: The NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the Old Testament & the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, & the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.
Here are some web resources that might help:
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=2779
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4547 http://www.humanism.org.uk/uploadedFiles/cms/store//Oracle_Books/article_HumanistsTalking_files/ATTACHMENTS/Beliefs%20and%20Identity%20final.pdf
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1072/Life-Course-Theory-Key-Principles-Concepts.html
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1625/Steve_Cornell
http://lordslaw.com/soulheal.htm
http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm
http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/seamands/general.htm