Talk:KCU/04/Group 2: Difference between revisions
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft == | == Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft == | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
3. Bring in commentaries on those scriptures as dialog partners. The most likely helpful ones are commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series. | 3. Bring in commentaries on those scriptures as dialog partners. The most likely helpful ones are commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series. | ||
Here are some web resources that my be helpful: | |||
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=2779 | |||
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4547 | |||
http://www.humanism.org.uk/uploadedFiles/cms/store//Oracle_Books/article_HumanistsTalking_files/ATTACHMENTS/Beliefs%20and%20Identity%20final.pdf | |||
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1072/Life-Course-Theory-Key-Principles-Concepts.html | |||
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1625/Steve_Cornell | |||
http://lordslaw.com/soulheal.htm | |||
http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm |
Revision as of 14:47, 1 October 2007
Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft
As a first draft, your contribution falls short. If this was the final draft, you would not pass. However, this is not the good draft! So, you're OK. What you have is a good introduction, a few good quotes, & some suggestive paragraphs on how to deal with the past. What you need is more evidence, more dialog partners from extra research (a lot more than just nice quotes), & a major expansion in the discussion of how to deal with your past.
Things to improve:
1. Bring in more dialog partners from extra research.
2. Bring in all relevant Scriptures.
3. Bring in commentaries on those scriptures as dialog partners. The most likely helpful ones are commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.
Here are some web resources that my be helpful:
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=2779
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4547 http://www.humanism.org.uk/uploadedFiles/cms/store//Oracle_Books/article_HumanistsTalking_files/ATTACHMENTS/Beliefs%20and%20Identity%20final.pdf
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1072/Life-Course-Theory-Key-Principles-Concepts.html
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1625/Steve_Cornell
http://lordslaw.com/soulheal.htm
http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm