Talk:KCU/03/King Pins: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft ==
== Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft ==


Line 9: Line 8:


3. You will want to bring in technical commentaries on those scriptures. The following commentary series are the most likely to be helpful: The NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the Old Testament & the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, & the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.
3. You will want to bring in technical commentaries on those scriptures. The following commentary series are the most likely to be helpful: The NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the Old Testament & the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, & the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.
Here are some web resources that might help:
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=2779
http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4547
http://www.humanism.org.uk/uploadedFiles/cms/store//Oracle_Books/article_HumanistsTalking_files/ATTACHMENTS/Beliefs%20and%20Identity%20final.pdf
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1072/Life-Course-Theory-Key-Principles-Concepts.html
http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1625/Steve_Cornell
http://lordslaw.com/soulheal.htm
http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm

Revision as of 14:31, 1 October 2007

Instructor's Feedback on Your First Draft

As a first draft, your contribution falls short. You do have some good paragraphs put together. You are lacking detailed evidence & dialog partners from extra research. If this were the final draft, it would not pass. But this is not the final draft, so you're OK. You actually do have some good paragraphs to build on. So, you did OK for now.

1. For each of your paragraphs & points, you can improve by bringing in dialog partners from extra research

2. You will profit from bringing all relevant scriptures into the discussion

3. You will want to bring in technical commentaries on those scriptures. The following commentary series are the most likely to be helpful: The NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the Old Testament & the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, & the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.

Here are some web resources that might help:


http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=2779

http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=4547 http://www.humanism.org.uk/uploadedFiles/cms/store//Oracle_Books/article_HumanistsTalking_files/ATTACHMENTS/Beliefs%20and%20Identity%20final.pdf

http://family.jrank.org/pages/1072/Life-Course-Theory-Key-Principles-Concepts.html

http://www.christianworldviewnetwork.com/article.php/1625/Steve_Cornell

http://lordslaw.com/soulheal.htm

http://www.drcloud.com/Articles/CBTCDYC_2_Leave_Past_Behind.htm