CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki1b 8 ktrk: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==Strategy Pattern Implementation in Java and Ruby== | ==Strategy Pattern Implementation in Java and Ruby== | ||
===Class Diagram=== | ===Class Diagram=== | ||
[[Image: | [[Image:Wiki1bClasses.jpg|Strategy pattern class diagram]] | ||
===Java=== | ===Java=== | ||
Fighter.java: | Fighter.java: |
Revision as of 04:01, 1 October 2007
Introduction
What is the Strategy Pattern?
The strategy pattern is a proven object oriented design pattern that can be used to solve a common coupling problem often found in software development. Often during the development of compositional classes behaviors and algorithms can become mixed into the class during development without realizing that these behaviors or algorithms may change, become more complex, or additional behaviors may need to be added. These changes could be implemented by extending the class's behavior through inheritance, but over time this could result in an overly complex class hierarchy. The strategy pattern is a design template that can be used to decouple the behavior and algorithms from object being acted upon.
When to Use the Strategy Pattern
In the seminal book on design patterns by the Gang-of-Four (Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides), situations (also labeled "code smells" by Martin Fowler in Refactoring) are described where the strategy design pattern could be used to architect a better solution. These include:
1. A class that exhibits many behaviors
2. A class that uses many variations of an algorithm
3. A class that uses data structures related to a behavior but not the class
4. Many similar classes that differ only in a type of behavior
Advantages of the Strategy Pattern
By decoupling through the use of composition rather than inheritance, several advantages emerge that improve the maintainability and readability of the code.
1. Allows classes to change behavior at runtime or design time
2. Decreases code duplication among classes using variations of the same behavior [1]
3. Behavior is better encapsulated by not being buried in its context [2]
4. A well known design pattern communicates the intent of the code more readily
Similar Patterns
Use the state pattern when the state of the object changes with a change in behavior.
Use the bridge pattern when a structural design is needed.
For a discussion of the strategy pattern compared to the state and bridge patterns see Strategy Pattern vs. Bridge Pattern.
Use the command pattern when the invoking object (the context object in the state pattern) does not have knowlege of the recipient object (the behavior in the state pattern). The intermediary command object takes care of dispatching the request to the appropriate object.
Strategy Pattern Implementation in Java and Ruby
Class Diagram
Java
Fighter.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public abstract class Fighter { private Attack attack; public Fighter(){ setAttack(); } public Attack getAttack() { return attack; } public void setAttack(Attack attack) { this.attack = attack; } protected abstract void setAttack(); public void fight() { getAttack().execute(); } }
JudoPlayer.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class JudoPlayer extends Fighter { public void setAttack() { setAttack(new LegSweep()); } }
KickBoxer.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class KickBoxer extends Fighter { public void setAttack() { setAttack(new RoundhouseKick()); } }
Boxer.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class Boxer extends Fighter { public void setAttack() { setAttack(new Jab()); } }
Wrestler.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class Wrestler extends Fighter { public void setAttack() { setAttack(new ShootIn()); } }
Attack.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public interface Attack { public void execute(); }
RoundhouseKick.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class RoundhouseKick implements Attack { public void execute() { System.out.println("Roundhouse Kick!"); } }
ShootIn.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class ShootIn implements Attack { public void execute() { System.out.println("Shoot In!"); } }
LegSweep.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class LegSweep implements Attack { public void execute() { System.out.println("Leg Sweep!"); } }
Jab.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class Jab implements Attack { public void execute() { System.out.println("Jab!"); } }
Fight.java:
package csc517.wiki1b; public class Fight { public static void main(String[] args) { Fighter f1 = new Boxer(); Fighter f2 = new Wrestler(); for (int round = 0; round < 3; round++) { f1.fight(); f2.fight(); } } }
Ruby
Fighter.rb:
class Fighter attr_accessor :attack def initialize(&technique) @attack = technique end def fight @attack.call end def method_missing(method_name) puts "I don't know how to #{method_name}" end end
JudoPlayer.rb:
require 'Fighter' require 'LegSweep' class JudoPlayer < Fighter include LegSweep def initialize super { leg_sweep } end end
KickBoxer.rb:
require 'Fighter' require 'RoundhouseKick' class KickBoxer < Fighter include RoundhouseKick def initialize super { roundhouse_kick } end end
Boxer.rb:
require 'Fighter' require 'Jab' class Boxer < Fighter include Jab def initialize super { jab } end end
Wrestler.rb:
require 'Fighter' require 'ShootIn' class Wrestler < Fighter include ShootIn def initialize super { shoot_in } end end
RoundhouseKick.rb:
module RoundhouseKick def roundhouse_kick puts "Roundhouse Kick!" end end
ShootIn.rb:
module ShootIn def shoot_in puts "Shoot In!" end end
LegSweep.rb:
module LegSweep def leg_sweep puts "Leg Sweep!" end end
Jab.rb:
module Jab def jab puts "Jab!" end end
Fight.rb:
require 'Boxer' require 'Wrestler' require 'KickBoxer' require 'JudoPlayer' rounds = 3 fighters = [ Boxer.new, Wrestler.new ] rounds.times do fighters.each do |fighter| fighter.fight end end
Comparison of Implementations
References
Design Patterns, Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides, Addison-Wesley Pulishing, 1995
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Martin Fowler, Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1999