Talk:KCU/03/Lions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Instructor Feedback on First Draft == | == Instructor Feedback on First Draft == | ||
Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
As a first draft, this contribution falls short. (This would not pass if submitted for the final draft.) You do have some promising introductory paragraphs. You need to incorporate sources into your discussion. The unfilled parts of the outline need to be developed. | As a first draft, this contribution falls short. (This would not pass if submitted for the final draft.) You do have some promising introductory paragraphs. You need to incorporate sources into your discussion. The unfilled parts of the outline need to be developed. | ||
Things to work on: | '''Things to work on''': | ||
1. Write out paragraphs for the rest of the outline like with the introductory section. | 1. Write out paragraphs for the rest of the outline like with the introductory section. | ||
2. Bring in sources | 2. Bring in sources | ||
3. Look up biblical evidence | 3. Look up biblical evidence | ||
4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series | 4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series | ||
5. Clean up the formatting | 5. Clean up the formatting |
Revision as of 02:15, 27 September 2007
Instructor Feedback on First Draft
As a first draft, this contribution falls short. (This would not pass if submitted for the final draft.) You do have some promising introductory paragraphs. You need to incorporate sources into your discussion. The unfilled parts of the outline need to be developed.
Things to work on:
1. Write out paragraphs for the rest of the outline like with the introductory section.
2. Bring in sources
3. Look up biblical evidence
4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series
5. Clean up the formatting