CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2010/ch5 5c ck: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
ir.render(); | ir.render(); | ||
} | } | ||
</pre> | |||
<br/>In the above example, when ir is a Circle it is dynamically downcast to Circle to call Circle.render() and when ir is a Polygon it is downcast to Polygon to call Polygon .render(); | <br/>In the above example, when ir is a Circle it is dynamically downcast to Circle to call Circle.render() and when ir is a Polygon it is downcast to Polygon to call Polygon .render(); | ||
</ | <br/> | ||
'''Note:''' This example would be the same if IRenderable were a class or abstract class object.<br/> | '''Note:''' This example would be the same if IRenderable were a class or abstract class object.<br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 03:24, 21 November 2010
Introduction
Dynamic dispatch means there is a determination of which method to execute at run time, when a class and one of it's subclasses have the same method signature. Evaluation of Control Structures for Dynamic Dispatch in JAVA (pg 5)[1]
Dynamic dispatch occurs when a class is downcast to one of its super classes and a method is called on that super class object.
See the Generic Example for an explanation of downcasting.
Generic Example
Using Dynamic Dispatch
We have a set of objects that can be rendered to the display.
Each object implements the IRenderable interface as seen below:
Utilizing the ability of dynamic dispatch it is very simple to render a collection of IRenderable[] objects for the display:
IRenderable[] irCollection = {new Circle(0,0,.5), new Polygon(0,0,1,1,2,2,0,0)} foreach (IRenderable ir in irCollection) { ir.render(); }
In the above example, when ir is a Circle it is dynamically downcast to Circle to call Circle.render() and when ir is a Polygon it is downcast to Polygon to call Polygon .render();
Note: This example would be the same if IRenderable were a class or abstract class object.
Static Simulation of Dynamic Dispatch
Without dynamic dispatch we would have to test the type of the object, cast it to a subtype and make the call.
IRenderable[] irCollection = {new Circle(0,0,.5), new Polygon(0,0,1,1,2,2,0,0)} foreach (IRenderable ir in irCollection) { if (ir is Circle) ((Circle)ir).render(); if (ir is Polygon) ((Polygon)ir).render(); }
This is more complicated than using dynamic dispatch and it also requires us to alter this code every time we add a new class.
Single and Multiple Dispatch
Single Dispatch
At a minimum, all Object Oriented languages implement a dynamic dispatch process known as single dispatch (pg2)[2].
In single dispatch a method call considers the dynamic type of only the class that the message is sent to.
The source argument is the only one that is accessed at run time, all parameters are treated as static types.
Multiple Dispatch
A few Object Oriented languages implement a more complete dynamic dispatch process known as multiple dispatch (pg2)[2].
In multiple dispatch more than one or all objects are accessed dynamically at run time.
The source object is accessed at run time, and one or more parameters are dynamically accessed at run time.
Double Dispatch
This method uses single dispatch and the visitor pattern pg(526-530)[3] to simulate a special form of multiple dispatch where the run time types of two arguments are taken into account.
Multiple Dispatch Simulation
Efficient multimethods in a single dispatch Language[2] is a paper that describes several methods that can be used to simulate multi dispatch in a single dispatch language. It also compares the relative performance of each method.
Example
class Thing{ function defeats(Thing t) {throw SingleDispatchException} } class Rock extends Thing{ function defeats(Rock r){throw tryagain} function defeats(Scissors s){return t} function defeats(Paper p){return f} } class Paper extends Thing{ function defeats(Rock r){return t} function defeats(Scissors s){return f} function defeats(Paper p){throw tryagain} } class Scissors extends Thing{ function defeats(Rock r){return f} function defeats(Scissors s){throw tryagain} function defeats(Paper p){return t} } Rock r = new Rock(); Thing rt = new Rock(); Thing pt = new Paper(); pt.defeats(rt); pt.defeats(r);
In a single dispatch language:
- pt has a dynamic type of paper so pt. will call the methods in the paper object.
- pt.defeats(rt); would throw SingleDispatchException because the parameter rt is of static type Thing.
- pt.defeats(r); would return true because the parameter r is of static type Rock
In a multiple dispatch language:
- pt has a dynamic type of paper so pt. will call the methods in the paper object.
- pt.defeats(rt); would return true because the parameter rt is of dynamic type Rock.
- pt.defeats(r); would return true because the parameter r is of dynamic type Rock
Performance
According to Technical Report on C++ Performance (pg 26)[4] "Calling a virtual function is roughly equivalent to calling a function through a pointer stored in an array"
I interpret this to mean that the speed of single dispatch is roughly the same as the speed of calling a non dispatched method.
Efficient multimethods in a single dispatch Language (pg 16,17)[2] tested the performance of their simulated multiple dispatch methods showing (pg 17):
Performanace Comparison
Method | Speed |
---|---|
Single Dispatch | 0.20 |
Double Dispatch | 1.00 |
Multidispatch (3 args) | 1.35 |
Multidispatch (7 args) | 2.32 |
It also shows that other methods such as case statements or dictionary lookup are significantly slower.
MultiJava is a Java language that support multiple dispatch. MultiJava: Design, implementation, and evaluation (pg 89 table 6)[5] shows that in MultiJava the native multiple dispatch methods are 62% faster than simulated double dispatch and 59% faster than simulated multiple dispatch.
Conclusion
The information presented in this article covered all of the different types of run time dispatch. It also demonstrated that the trade off between simulated multiple dispatch and native multiple dispatch is only a factor in an application where a very large number of iterations involving multiple dispatch operations are present.
References
[1] Evaluation of Control Structures for Dynamic Dispatch in Java by Inira Lorraine and Karel Drieson(pg 5)
[2] Efficient Multimethods in a single dispatch Language Brian Foote, Ralph E. Johnson and James Noble
[3] Visitor by Robert C. Martin 2002 pg(526-520)
[4] Technical Report on C++ Performance ISO/IEC TR 18015:2006(E) 2006-02-15 (pg. 26)
[5] MultiJava: Design, implementation, and evaluation Curtis Charles Clifton November 2001(pg 89 table 6)