CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2010/ch6 6j SO: Difference between revisions
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
== Benefits of SOA == | == Benefits of SOA == | ||
SOAs offer the following advantages over | '''SOAs offer the following advantages over other approaches:''' | ||
They offer business services across the platforms | They offer business services across the platforms | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
The search and connectivity to other services is dynamic | The search and connectivity to other services is dynamic | ||
Short-term benefits of implementation: | '''Short-term benefits of implementation:''' | ||
Enhances reliability | Enhances reliability | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Provides a data bridge between incompatible technologies | Provides a data bridge between incompatible technologies | ||
Long-term benefits of implementation: | '''Long-term benefits of implementation:''' | ||
Provides the ability to build composite applications | Provides the ability to build composite applications | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
Enables the compilation of a unified taxonomy of information across an enterprise and its customer and partners | Enables the compilation of a unified taxonomy of information across an enterprise and its customer and partners | ||
Benefits from the perspective of Business Value | '''Benefits from the perspective of Business Value''' | ||
Ability to more quickly meet customer demands | Ability to more quickly meet customer demands |
Revision as of 18:50, 16 November 2010
Service-oriented architecture
Introduction
SOA (service-oriented architecture) has become a buzzword of late. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) refers to SOA as 'A set of components which can be invoked, and whose interface descriptions can be published and discovered'. Although the concepts behind SOA have been around for over a decade now, SOA has gained extreme popularity of late due to web services. Before we dive in and talk about what SOA is and what the essentials behind SOA are, it is a useful first step to look back at the evolution of SOA. To do that, we have to simply look at the challenges developers have faced over the past few decades and observe the solutions that have been proposed to solve their problems.
The Problem
Early programmers realized that writing software was becoming more and more complex. They needed a better way to reuse some of the code that they were rewriting. When researchers took notice of this, they introduced the concept of modular design. With modular design principles, programmers could write subroutines and functions and reuse their code. This was great for a while. Later, developers started to see that they were cutting and pasting their modules into other applications and that this started to create a maintenance nightmare; when a bug was discovered in a function somewhere, they had to track down all of the applications that used the function and modify the code to reflect the fix. After the fix, the deployment nightmare began. Developers didn't like that; they needed a higher level of abstraction.
Researchers proposed classes and object-oriented software to solve this, and many more, problems. Again, as software complexity grew, developers started to see that developing and maintaining software was complex and they wanted a way to reuse and maintain functionality, not just code. Researchers offered yet another abstraction layer to handle this complexity -- component-based software. Component-based software is/was a good solution for reuse and maintenance, but it doesn't address all of the complexities developers are faced with today. Today, we face complex issues like distributed software, application integration, varying platforms, varying protocols, various devices, the Internet, etc. Today's software has to be equipped to answer the call for all of the above. In short, SOA (along with web services) provides a solution to all of the above. By adopting a SOA, you eliminate the headaches of protocol and platforms and your applications integrate seamlessly.
Key Components of SOA
The first step in learning something new is to understand its vocabulary. In the context of SOA, we have the terms service, message, dynamic discovery, and web services. Each of these plays an essential role in SOA.
Service
A service in SOA is an exposed piece of functionality with three properties:
1. The interface contract to the service is platform-independent.
2. The service can be dynamically located and invoked.
3. The service is self-contained. That is, the service maintains its own state.
A platform-independent interface contract implies that a client from anywhere, on any OS, and in any language, can consume the service. Dynamic discovery hints that a discovery service (e.g., a directory service) is available. The directory service enables a look-up mechanism where consumers can go to find a service based on some criteria. For example, if I was looking for a credit-card authorization service, I might query the directory service to find a list of service providers that could authorize a credit card for a fee. Based on the fee, I would select a service (see Figure 1.1). The last property of a service is that the service be self-contained.
Message
Service providers and consumers communicate via messages. Services expose an interface contract. This contract defines the behavior of the service and the messages they accept and return. Because the interface contract is platform- and language-independent, the technology used to define messages must also be agnostic to any specific platform/language. Therefore, messages are typically constructed using XML documents that conform to XML schema. XML provides all of the functionality, granularity, and scalability required by messages. That is, for consumers and providers to effectively communicate, they need a non-restrictive type of system to clearly define messages; XML provides this. Because consumers and providers communicate via messages, the structure and design of messages should not be taken lightly. Messages need to be implemented using a technology that supports the scalability requirements of services. Having to redesign messages will break the interface to providers, which can prove to be costly.
Dynamic Discovery
Dynamic discovery is an important piece of SOA. At a high level, SOA is composed of three core pieces: service providers, service consumers, and the directory service. The role of providers and consumers are apparent, but the role of the directory service needs some explanation. The directory service is an intermediary between providers and consumers. Providers register with the directory service and consumers query the directory service to find service providers. Most directory services typically organize services based on criteria and categorize them. Consumers can then use the directory services' search capabilities to find providers. Embedding a directory service within SOA accomplishes the following:
1. Scalability of services; you can add services incrementally.
2. Decouples consumers from providers.
3. Allows for hot updates of services.
4. Provides a look-up service for consumers.
5. Allows consumers to choose between providers at runtime rather than hard-coding a single provider.
Web Service
Although the concepts behind SOA were established long before web services came along, web services play a major role in a SOA. This is because web services are built on top of well-known and platform-independent protocols. These protocols include HTTP, XML, UDDI, WSDL, and SOAP. It is the combination of these protocols that make web services so attractive. Moreover, it is these protocols that fulfill the key requirements of a SOA. That is, a SOA requires that a service be dynamically discoverable and invokeable. This requirement is fulfilled by UDDI, WSDL, and SOAP. SOA requires that a service have a platform-independent interface contract. This requirement is fulfilled by XML. SOA stresses interoperability. This requirement is fulfilled by HTTP. This is why web services lie at the heart of SOA.
Benefits of SOA
SOAs offer the following advantages over other approaches:
They offer business services across the platforms They provide location independence Services need not be at a particular system or particular network Completely loosely coupled approach Authentication and authorization support at every level The search and connectivity to other services is dynamic
Short-term benefits of implementation:
Enhances reliability Reduces hardware acquisition costs Leverages existing development skills Accelerates movement to standards-based server and application consolidation Provides a data bridge between incompatible technologies
Long-term benefits of implementation:
Provides the ability to build composite applications Creates a self-healing infrastructure that reduces management costs Provides truly real-time decision-making applications Enables the compilation of a unified taxonomy of information across an enterprise and its customer and partners
Benefits from the perspective of Business Value
Ability to more quickly meet customer demands Lower costs associated with the acquisition and maintenance of technology Management of business functionality closer to the business units Leverages existing investments in technology Reduces reliance on expensive custom development
Conclusion
Even though we have decades of experience in software development, we have yet to solve the mysteries of software complexity. As complexity grows, researchers find more innovative ways to answer the call. SOA, in combination with web services, is the latest answer. Application integration is one of the major issues companies face today; SOA can solve that. System availability, reliability, and scalability continue to bite companies today; SOA addresses these issues. Given today's requirements, SOA is the best scalable solution for application architecture.