CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2010/ch3 3j KS

Introduction

Object-relational mapping (ORM) provides developers with a set of tools that ease management of the relationships between objects and relational databases, thus allowing applications to be easily extended to add data persistence. For Ruby, several object-relational mapping options are available. This wiki concentrates more on the comparison of ORM's and it gives a very high level overview of the various ORM's such as ActiveRecord , Sequel and DataMapper.

Overview

Object-relational Mapping (ORM) frameworks unburden the designer of the complex translation between database and object space.

Typical ORM features:

• Automatic mapping from classes to database tables
  • Class instance variables to database columns
  • Class instances to table rows
• Aggregation and association relationships between mapped classes are managed
  • Example, :has_many, :belongs_to associations in ActiveRecord
  • Inheritance cases are mapped to tables
• Validation of data prior to table storage
• Class extensions to enable search, as well as creation, read, update, and deletion (CRUD) of instances/records
• Usually abstracts the database from program space in such a way that alternate database types can be easily chosen (SQLite, Oracle, etc)

The diagram below depicts a simple mapping of an object to a database table….

When applied to Ruby, implementations of ORM often leverage the language’s metaprogramming strengths to create intuitive application-specific methods and otherwise extend classes to support database functionality.

ActiveRecord

ActiveRecord, originally created by David Heinemeier and released in 2003, became the de-facto ORM for Ruby since it was integrated in the widely-used Rails framework, however alternate ORMs for Ruby have been developed and Rails 3.x is ORM independent. ActiveRecord is an implementation of the active record design pattern, where a table is wrapped into a class and this class implements accessor methods for each column in the table.

To create a table, ActiveRecord makes use of a migration class rather than including table definition in the actual class being modeled. As an example, the following code creates a table ‘’users’’ to store a collection of class ‘’User’’ objects:

class CreateUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration
  def self.up
    create_table :users do |t|
      t.string :name
      t.string :email
      t.string :age

      t.timestamps     # add creation and modification timestamps
    end
  end

  def self.down        # undo the table creation
    drop_table :users
  end
end

Note in the preceeding example, that the ActiveRecord’s migration scheme provides a means for backing out changes via the ‘’self.down’’ method. In addition, a table key ‘’id’’ is added to the new table without explicit definition and record creation and modification timestamps are included via the ‘’timestamps’’ method provided by ActiveRecord.

ActiveRecord manages associations between table elements and provides the means to define such associations in the model definition. For example, the ‘’User’’ class shown below defines a ‘’to_many’’ association with both the cheers and posts tables. Also note ActiveRecord’s integrated support for validation of table information when attempting an update.

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :cheers
  has_many :posts
  
  validates_presence_of :name
  validates_presence_of :age
  validates_uniqueness_of :name
  validates_length_of :name, :within => 3..20
end

While ActiveRecord provides the flexibility to create more sophisticated table relationships to represent class hierarchy, its base scheme is a single table inheritance, which trades some storage efficiency for simplicity in the database design. The following figure illustrates this concept of simplicity over efficiency.

Pros -

• Integrated with popular Rails development framework
• Dynamically created database search methods (eg: User.find_by_address) ease db queries and make queries database syntax independent
• DB creation/management using the migrate scheme provides a means for backing out unwanted table changes

Cons -

• DB creation/management is decoupled from the model, requiring a separate utility (rake/migrate) that must be kept in sync with application

Sequel

Sequel was originally developed by Sharon Rosner and the first release was in March 2007. It is based on the active record pattern. Sequel and Active record share a lot of common features , for example association and inheritance. But Sequel handles these features in a much more flexible manner. Currently Sequel is at version 3.16.0. Initially Sequel was had three core modules - sequel, sequel_core and sequel_model.Starting from version 1.4 , sequel and sequel_model were merged. Sequel handles validations using a validation plug-in and helpers.

class CreateUser < Sequel::Migration
  def up
    create_table(:user) {
      primary_key :id
      String :name
      String :age
      String :email}
  end
  def down
    drop_table(:user)
  end
end # CreateUser.apply(DB, :up)

Sequel supports associations and validations similar to ActiveRecord. The following example shows how validations and associations can be enforced int he User table that has been created above. It enforces one to many relationship between the user table and the cheers , posts tables. It also validates for the presence , uniqueness and the length of the attribute name.

class User < Sequel::Model
  one_to_many :cheers
  one_to_many :posts
  
  validates_presence [:name, :age]
  validates_unique(:name)
  validates_length_range 3..20, :name
end

Some of the key features of sequel are,

• Connection Pooling
• Thread Safety
• Eager Loading / Lazy Loading
• Model Caching

DataMapper

DataMapper is an open source ORM for Ruby originally developed by Sam Smoot and first released in 2007. DataMapper provides a very flexible mapping API which allows creation of adapters to a wide variety of datastores beyond traditional SQL-based relational databases – DataMapper adapters have been created to non-standard sources such as the Salesforce API and even Google Video.

Unlike ActiveRecord and Sequel, DataMapper does not rely on a migration scheme to create and manage DB tables. Instead, DataMapper allows table definition as part of the model class definition which keeps the model definition contained to a single file, thus minimizing the effort required to keep the database and model definitions in sync. When required, DataMapper can also support a migration methodology similar to other ORMs.

Example of table definition in the model:

class User
  include DataMapper::Resource

  property :id,         Serial    # key
  property :name,       String, :required => true, :unique => true     
  property :age,        String, :required => true, :length => 3..20 
  property :email,      String 
  
  has n, :comments    # one to many association
end

Notice that in the example above , ":required = true" is an example for Auto Validation. Unlike ActiveRecord and Sequel, DataMapper supports auto validations , i.e. these in turn call the validation helpers to enforce basic validations such as length, uniqueness, format, presence etc.

Some of the key features of DataMapper are:

• API supports a wide variety of databases, including non SQL types
• Thread Safety
• Eager loading of child associations
• Lazy loading

Comparison of ORM Features

Features	ActiveRecord	Sequel	DataMapper
Databases	MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Oracle, SQLServer, and DB2	ADO, DataObjects, DB2, DBI, Firebird, Informix, JDBC, MySQL, ODBC, OpenBase, Oracle, PostgreSQL and SQLite3	SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, MongoDB, SimpleDB, many others, including CouchDB, Apache Solr, Google Data API
Migrations	Yes	Yes	Yes, but optional
EagerLoading	Supported by scanning the SQL fragments	Supported using eager (preloading) and eager_graph (joins)	Supported
Flexible Overriding	No. Overriding is done using alias methods.	Using methods and by calling 'super'	Using methods (verify)
Dynamic Finders	Yes. Uses 'Method Missing'	No. Alternative is to use <Model>.FindOrCreate(:name=>"John")	Yes. Using the dm_ar_finders plugin

Further Reading

To get more information on ORM and the different type of ORM's available for Ruby , please look into the Object-relational mapping Fall 2007 wiki.

Future Work

More work can be done in the area of comparison between the different ORMs available for Ruby, especially a performance comparison between the ORM's. We came across one cool website which has the ORM comparison for .Net ORMBattle.Net. Something similar would be really helpful. Due to the time contraint and lack of indepth knowledge we were not able to work on these areas.

References

1. Wikipedia, Object-relational mapping (ORM)
2. ActiveRecord
3. Wikipedia Active record pattern
4. Sequel
5. Sequel Presentation - By Jeremy Evans
6. Merbist blog on custom DM adapters - By Matt Aimonetti
7. DataMapper
8. Object-Relational Mapping Fall 2007
9. ORMBattle.Net