CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki1 3 b6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
when 1 then '' | when 1 then '' | ||
when 2 then 'WARNING: ' | when 2 then 'WARNING: ' | ||
when 3 then 'ERROR: ' | when 3 then 'ERROR: ' | ||
end | end | ||
puts prepend+msg | puts prepend+msg | ||
Line 131: | Line 130: | ||
when 2 then 'WARNING: ' | when 2 then 'WARNING: ' | ||
when 3 then 'ERROR: ' | when 3 then 'ERROR: ' | ||
end | end | ||
puts prepend+msg | puts prepend+msg |
Revision as of 04:50, 12 September 2007
Example use of Currying in Ruby by Ben Parees
The following pair of programs demonstrates the value of currying functions in Ruby. The program itself implements a simple account balance management tool which allows for withdrawals and deposits as specified by the user. In the first program, a Logger class is defined with a single function, "logMessage" which takes an integer log level parameter, and the message to be logged. Depending on the log level specified, and the overall logging level set in the Logger class, the message may or may not be displayed to the user. If the message is to be displayed, it will be prefixed with a string indicating the message's relative importance.
The purpose of this class is to allow programmers to easily reconfigure their program to provide varying degrees of debugging output without changing code. They can simply change the log level that is configured, and automatically filter out messages which are below that log level. In addition, messages are automatically tagged with a string indicating their severity, which makes analyzing logs much easier.
Here is the initial version of the program:
class Logger @logLevel attr_accessor :logLevel def initialize(n) @logLevel=n end def logMessage(n,msg) if(n>=@logLevel) prepend=case n when 0 then 'DEBUG: ' when 1 then '' when 2 then 'WARNING: ' when 3 then 'ERROR: ' end puts prepend+msg end end end class Account @balance @logger attr_reader :balance def initialize(n,logger) @balance=n @logger=logger logger.logMessage(0,"initialized account with balance of #{n}"); end def getAmount @logger.logMessage(0,"enter getAmount method") amount=gets.chomp!.to_f @logger.logMessage(0,"Got amount #{amount}") if(amount<0) @logger.logMessage(3,"Amount is less than zero, amount will be set to zero") amount=0 end return amount end def withdraw @logger.logMessage(0,"enter withdraw method") @logger.logMessage(1,"How much would you like to withdraw?") amount=getAmount @logger.logMessage(0,"withdrawing amount of #{amount}") @balance=@balance-amount if(@balance<0) @logger.logMessage(2,"Account is overdrawn") end @logger.logMessage(0,"new balance is #{@balance}") end def deposit @logger.logMessage(0,"enter depost method") amount=getAmount @logger.logMessage(0,"depositing amount of #{amount}") @balance=@balance+amount @logger.logMessage(0,"new balance is #{balance}") end end action="d" logger=Logger.new(0) account=Account.new(100,logger) while action!="q" logger.logMessage(1,"Balance=#{account.balance}, would you like to withdraw, deposit, or quit [w/d/q]?") action=gets.chomp! logger.logMessage(0,"user chose action #{action}") if action=="w" account.withdraw elsif action=="d" account.deposit elsif action=="q" logger.logMessage(1,"goodbye") end end
In the initial form of the program, the programmer must specify the log level parameter for each trace statement they wish to create. This approach has two drawbacks: 1) The programmer must know what log level corresponds to what level of trace (0=debug, 1=info, 2=warning, 3=error, etc). If they make a mistake in their numbering, the trace will not be correct. 2) The code is hard to read since it is not obvious just by looking at a piece of code, whether a message is going to be printed as a debug statement, informational statement, warning, etc.
Now the same program, but with 4 new methods defined by currying the original logMessage method. The new methods are:
1) debug - print a debug level message
2) print - print an informational message
3) warn - print a warning level message
4) error - print an error level message
The actual currying is done in the Logger class, and the invocation of these methods can be seen in the body of the main program and the Account class.
class Logger @logLevel @debug @print @warn @error attr_accessor :logLevel def initialize(n) @logLevel=n @debug=lambda{|msg| logMessage(0,msg)} @print=lambda{|msg| logMessage(1,msg)} @warn= lambda{|msg| logMessage(2,msg)} @error=lambda{|msg| logMessage(3,msg)} end def logMessage(n,msg) if(n>=@logLevel) prepend=case n when 0 then 'DEBUG: ' when 1 then '' when 2 then 'WARNING: ' when 3 then 'ERROR: ' end puts prepend+msg end end def debug(msg) @debug.call(msg) end def print(msg) @print.call(msg) end def warn(msg) @warn.call(msg) end def error(msg) @error.call(msg) end end class Account @balance @logger attr_reader :balance def initialize(n,logger) @balance=n @logger=logger logger.debug("initialized account with balance of #{n}"); end def getAmount @logger.debug("enter getAmount method") amount=gets.chomp!.to_f @logger.debug("Got amount #{amount}") if(amount<0) @logger.error("Amount is less than zero, amount will be set to zero") amount=0 end return amount end def withdraw @logger.debug("enter withdraw method") @logger.print("How much would you like to withdraw?") amount=getAmount @logger.debug("withdrawing amount of #{amount}") @balance=@balance-amount if(@balance<0) @logger.warn("Account is overdrawn") end @logger.debug("new balance is #{@balance}") end def deposit @logger.debug("enter depost method") amount=getAmount @logger.debug("depositing amount of #{amount}") @balance=@balance+amount @logger.debug("new balance is #{balance}") end end action="d" logger=Logger.new(0) account=Account.new(100,logger) while action!="q" logger.print("Balance=#{account.balance}, would you like to withdraw, deposit, or quit [w/d/q]?") action=gets.chomp! logger.debug("user chose action #{action}") if action=="w" account.withdraw elsif action=="d" account.deposit elsif action=="q" logger.print("goodbye") end end
Notice how much easier it is to follow the flow of the program now through the clear labelling of debug/print/warning/error statements. In addition, observe how simple it would be to add a new trace statement at any log level simply by invoking the desired method rather than having to look up the appropriate log level value.
--Bmparees 00:48, 12 September 2007 (EDT)