Talk:CSC/ECE 506 Fall 2007/wiki1 4 a1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
"not very well; a separate section for superscalar could have been added rather than clubbing it with VLIW"
"not very well; a separate section for superscalar could have been added rather than clubbing it with VLIW"


It seems to be persuadable, however, I don't think so because superscalar processor has been the most major issues over most micro architecure past 20 years more. The explored architecure such as VLIW and others by this assignment are based on basically supersclar processor, although superscalar is the most important architecture. The visited architectures are a kind of additional benecial features on superscalar.
It sounds persuasive, however, I don't entirely agree because superscalar processor has been the most major issues over the micro architecture for the past 20 years or more. The explored architecture such as VLIW and others by this assignment are basically based on the supersclar processor. The visited architectures are, in a sense, additionally benecial features on superscalar.


= The reviewer pointed out the material seems not to be original, because the rephrased paragraph took small portion. The updated version are restructured, rephrased and added version of the previous one.
= The reviewer pointed out the material seems not to be original, because the rephrased paragraph took small portion. The updated version are restructured, rephrased and added version of the previous one.
Line 11: Line 11:
"the author mentions that the current technology used in .13 microns. I think the current market trend is .045 microns with active research going on on .022 micron technology. That fact could have been mentioned."
"the author mentions that the current technology used in .13 microns. I think the current market trend is .045 microns with active research going on on .022 micron technology. That fact could have been mentioned."


There were misunderstood of length unit, micron. The new version reflects new information.
There seems misunderstanding of length unit, micron. In addtion, the information provided by the reviewer is out of date. The new version reflects new information.

Latest revision as of 02:47, 11 September 2007

= The reviewer pointed out as below.

"not very well; a separate section for superscalar could have been added rather than clubbing it with VLIW"

It sounds persuasive, however, I don't entirely agree because superscalar processor has been the most major issues over the micro architecture for the past 20 years or more. The explored architecture such as VLIW and others by this assignment are basically based on the supersclar processor. The visited architectures are, in a sense, additionally benecial features on superscalar.

= The reviewer pointed out the material seems not to be original, because the rephrased paragraph took small portion. The updated version are restructured, rephrased and added version of the previous one.

= The reviewer pointed out as below.

"the author mentions that the current technology used in .13 microns. I think the current market trend is .045 microns with active research going on on .022 micron technology. That fact could have been mentioned."

There seems misunderstanding of length unit, micron. In addtion, the information provided by the reviewer is out of date. The new version reflects new information.