CSC/ECE 506 Spring 2010/ch 3 yl: Difference between revisions
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
To give a better understanding, we illustrate the dependences using the code section below: | To give a better understanding, we illustrate the dependences using the code section below: | ||
'''for''' (i=1; i<N; i++) | '''for''' (i=1; i<N; i++) | ||
'''S1:''' a[i] = i; | |||
'''S2:''' b[i] = a[i]; | |||
'''S3:''' b[i] = a[i]+c[i]; | |||
'''S4:''' z[i] = 2*i; | |||
====Loop-independent==== | ====Loop-independent==== |
Revision as of 20:47, 20 February 2010
Supplement to Chapter 3: Support for parallel-programming models. Discuss how DOACROSS, DOPIPE, DOALL, etc. are implemented in packages such as Posix threads, Intel Thread Building Blocks, OpenMP 2.0 and 3.0.
Parallel-programming models
Loop-independent vs. loop-carried dependences
Before performing the three kinds of parallelism analysis, we need to discuss about loop-dependence analysis first.
Statement dependences
To discuss code analysis, let's define the framework as follows. Let S denote a statement in the source code. Let [] denote loop iteration space. Let S1 -> S2 denote statement S1 executes before S2. Then, we further define three statement dependences:
- S1 ->T S2 denotes true dependence: S1 -> S2, and S1 writes to a location that is read by S2.
- S1 ->A S2 denotes anti dependence: S1 -> S2, and S1 reads a location written by S2.
- S1 ->O S2 denotes output dependence: S1 -> S2, and S1 writes to the same location written by S2.
To give a better understanding, we illustrate the dependences using the code section below:
for (i=1; i<N; i++) S1: a[i] = i; S2: b[i] = a[i]; S3: b[i] = a[i]+c[i]; S4: z[i] = 2*i;
Loop-independent
Loop-carried dependences
DOALL
for i:=2:N-1 do A(i):=[A(i-1) + A(i) + A(i+1)]/3; next i; forall i:=2:N-1 do A(i):=[A(i-1) + A(i) + A(i+1)]/3;
for (i=2; i<=n; i+=2) s: a[i] = a[i-2]; for (i=3; i<=n; i+=2) s: a[i] = a[i-2];
DOACROSS
In code 3.7, apparently there is a loop-carried dependence existing in the code.
S[i] -> T S[i+1]
Obviously, there is no way to implement it as DOALL parallelism.
Code 3.7 A loop with loop-carried dependence for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { S: a[i] = a[i-1] + b[i] * c[i];}
If we split code 3.7 as two loops, then the fist loop can be implement in DOALL parallism. In code 3.8, first of all, we created a new array named temp[i]. Second, we put temp[i] in a loop which is individual and loop-independence. However, this solution generated a disadvantage: high storage. Due to increasing the array size of temp by i++, the size of temp depends on the number of iterations instead of threads. If N ( # of iteration) is bigger, then the size of temp will be larger.
Code 3.8 A split version of the loop in Code 3.7 for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { //this loop has DOALL parallelism S1: temp[i] = b[i] * c[i];} for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { S2: a[i] = a[i-1] + temp[i];}
post(0); for (i=1; i<=N; i++) { S1: temp[i] = b[i] * c[i];} wait(i-1); S2: a[i] = a[i-1] + temp[i]; post(i);}