CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2009/wiki3 13 ncs: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 149: Line 149:


= Conclusion =
= Conclusion =
Bertrand Meyer's principle does help us understand the code better and makes it easier to identify the impacted elements much more easily if there are any changes in the interface or we intend to compose or decompose the objects in smaller pieces.
Bertrand Meyer's principle of explicit interfaces helps us
* Decomposability - helps us make easier subprograms
* Composability - helps reuse of code
* Understandability - makes it easier and helps us better understand the programs
* Continuity - improves coupling


= References =
= References =
* [http://www.eoinwoods.info/doc/spa2009_patterns_session.pdf Design Principles Mining Pattern DNA]
* [http://www.eoinwoods.info/doc/spa2009_patterns_session.pdf Design Principles Mining Pattern DNA]
* [http://se.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/acm/eiffel_sigplan.pdf PROGRAMMING FOR REUSABILITY AND EXTENDIBILITY]
* [http://se.ethz.ch/~meyer/publications/acm/eiffel_sigplan.pdf PROGRAMMING FOR REUSABILITY AND EXTENDIBILITY]

Revision as of 01:39, 18 November 2009

Introduction

Bertrand Meyer's principle of explicit interface states that when 2 modules A and B communicate, this must be obvious from the text of A or B or both.

In this article we will consider the Pro's and cons of this approach. When it does and does not make sense to follow this principle.

Interface (Implicit vs Explicit)

A generic definition of an interface in programming context can be defined as a set of methods exposed that can be invoked by other objects. For most object oriented languages all protected and public methods of the Object will constitute to be the Object's interface.

Most object oriented languages provide a means to specify a specific behavior that the objects can implement.

For example If we wish to implement the behavior of automobile we could let each class that is an automobile have all the methods implemented without using an explicit interface or have a formal explicit interface defined that defines the automobile behavior and have each automobile object implement the well defined Automobile interface.

Code example

Let us consider the Automobile class. We can either define all the shared methods and behaviors implicitly as methods within the class

class Automobile {

public String getMake() {}

public String getModel() {}

public String getYear() {}

public String getLicensePlate() {}

public String getLicenseExpiration() {}

public void turn() {}

public void accelerate() {}

public void stop() {}

public String getSpeed() {}

public String getRPM() {}

public String getFuelLevel() {}

}

Alternatively define behaviors explicitly and have the car and truck class implement them.

interface Autospec{

public String getMake();

public String getModel();

public String getYear();

public String getLicensePlate();

public String getLicenseExpiration();

}

interface OperateAuto {

public void turn();

public void accelerate();

public void stop();

}

interface AutoDashboard{

public String getSpeed();

public String getRPM();

public String getFuelLevel();

}

class Automobile implements Autospec, OperateAuto, AutoDashboard{

// AutoSpec

public String getMake(){...}

public String getModel(){...}

public String getYear(){...}

public String getOwner() {...}

public String getLicensePlate(){...}

public String getLicenseExpiration(){...}

// OperateAuto

public void turn(){...}

public void accelerate(){...}

public void stop(){...}

// AutoDash

public String getSpeed(){...}

public String getRPM(){...}

public String getFuelLevel(){...}

}

Advantages of using explicit interface

Let us consider the advantages of having explicit interfaces

Understandability

The behaviors are well understood and helps us understand the functionality as a set of smaller related operations. By documenting the behaviors it is easier to understand each set and

the behavior individually and it is clear by looking at the Auto class that it implements these behavior. The interface exposed by the auto class can be easily understood.

Continuity

It is very easy to find the elements that a potential change can effect. In our example above if we have explicit interfaces to determine the impact of change in any of the interface

methods or modifying an interface itself can be easily determined by the determining the sets of elements that either implement the interface or invoke it.

Composability and Decomposability

It is easy to determine the impact if we have the need to decompose a module further. For example if we feel the need to split the specification interface into two one that deals with the specifications and the other that deals with DMV then any and all outside dependencies are clearly visible. We simply need to look at elements that use the Autospec interface only. Using simple interfaces to define behaviors also allows us to share this behavior across different classes there by increasing code reuseability. And since these behaviors are well understood it is easy to understand the behavior of objects that implement these behaviors.

Disadvantages of using explicit interfaces

Not really any

The only case it might not make sense probably a specialized object with a specialized behavior that doesn't really make sense to be defined as an interface. For example

class LocalGreeter {

  public void greet () {
     System.out.println (Localizer.getLocalized("hello");
  }

}

We could define a greeter interface but then we don't see any reuse for it.

Conclusion

Bertrand Meyer's principle of explicit interfaces helps us

  • Decomposability - helps us make easier subprograms
  • Composability - helps reuse of code
  • Understandability - makes it easier and helps us better understand the programs
  • Continuity - improves coupling

References