CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2009/wiki2 11 sv: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
Cut a new check for Jim! | Cut a new check for Jim! | ||
His salary is now 8000! | His salary is now 8000! | ||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 03:44, 9 October 2009
Design patterns
The idea of design pattern was first introduced by the architect Christopher Alexander in the field of architecture. Later it has been adapted for various other disciplines, including computer science. Christopher Alexander says, "Each pattern describes a problem which occurs over and over again in our environment, and then describes the core of the solution to that problem, in such a way that you can use this solution a million times over, without ever doing it the same way twice". Even though Alexander was talking about patterns in buildings and towns, what he says is true about object-oriented design patterns. Our solutions are expressed in terms of objects and interfaces instead of walls and doors, but at the core of both kinds of patterns is a solution to a problem in a context [1].
In general, a pattern has four essential elements:
- The pattern name is a handle used to describe a design problem, its solutions, and consequences in a word or two.
- The problem explains the problem and its context and also describes when to apply the pattern.
- The solution describes the elements that make up the design, their relationships, responsibilities, and collaborations.the pattern provides an abstract description of a design problem and how a general arrangement of elements solves it.
- The consequences are the results and trade-offs of applying the pattern.
A design pattern is a formal way of documenting a solution to a design problem in a particular field of expertise. In software engineering, a design pattern is a solution to a general and commonly occurring problem in software design. A design pattern is not a finished design that can be transformed directly into code. But it is a description or template for how to solve a problem that can be used in many different situations.
Design patterns in ruby
Almost every design patterns of ruby are borrowed from the GOF book. Following is the list of common pattern used in ruby.
- Template
- Strategy
- Observer
- Composite
- Iterator
- Commands
- Adapter
- Proxy
- Decorator
- Singleton
- Factory
- Builder
- Interpreter
Factory pattern
The essence of the Factory Pattern is to "Define an interface for creating an object, but let the subclasses decide which class to instantiate. The Factory method lets a class defer instantiation to subclasses."
Factory Method pattern is used when
- a class can't anticipate the class of objects it must create.
- a class wants its subclasses to specify the objects it creates.
- classes delegate responsibility to one of several helper subclasses, and you want to localize the knowledge of which helper subclass is the delegate. [1]
Will try to understand factory design pattern with the help of a real world problem. Imagine that we are asked to build a simulation of life in a pond. In particular, we need to model the comings and goings of the ducks. So we sit down and write a class to model the ducks:
Adapted from the class notes.
class Duck def initialize(name) @name = name end def speak puts("Duck #{@name} says Quack!") end end
But ducks also need a place to live(Which we didn't implemented in class), and for that we build a Pond class:
class Pond def initialize(number_ducks) @ducks = [] number_ducks.times do |i| duck = Duck.new("Duck#{i}") @ducks << duck end end def simulate_one_day @ducks.each {|duck| duck.speak} end end
Life on the pond continues idyllically until one dark day when we get a request to model a different denizen of the puddle: the frog. Now it is easy enough to create a Frog class that sports exactly the same interface as the ducks:
class Frog def initialize(name) @name = name end def speak puts("Frog #{@name} says Crooooaaaak!") end end
But there is a problem with the Pond class—right there in the initialize method we are explicitly creating ducks. And now we have exactly understood the problem which factory method solves.
Rewriting the factory adopted version of the Pound class.
class Pond def initialize(number_animals) @animals = [] number_animals.times do |i| animal = new_animal("Animal#{i}") @animals << animal end end def simulate_one_day @animals.each {|animal| animal.speak} end end
Next we can build two subclasses of Pond—one for a pond full of ducks and the other for a pond hopping with frogs:
class DuckPond < Pond def new_animal(name) Duck.new(name) end end class FrogPond < Pond def new_animal(name) Frog.new(name) end end
And can happily use them as below
pond = FrogPond.new(3) pond.simulate_one_day
Observer
The observer pattern (sometimes known as publish/subscribe) is a software design pattern in which an object, called the 'subject', maintains a list of its dependents, called 'observers', and notifies them automatically of any state changes, usually by calling one of their methods. It is mainly used to implement distributed event handling systems.
Example Scenario where Observer Pattern is Used:
Consider a personnel system where an employee's salary changes and the payroll department needs to know when these changes take place. Here, How can one make the Employee object spread the news about salary changes without tangling it up with the payroll system?
In such a situation, Observer pattern is used. Initially, an object is created that is interested in the state of a person's(any employee's) finances. This object then needs to simply register with that person's 'Employee Object' ahead of time. Once registered, that object would receive timely updates about the ups and downs of the person's paycheck.
Here is a basic version of an Employee object that tracks an employee. It does not have any code that tells about any salary updates.
class Employee attr_reader :name attr_accessor :title, :salary def initialize( name, title, salary ) @name = name @title = title @salary = salary end end
The employees can get raises because we made the salary field accessible with attr_accessor.
jim = Employee.new("Jim Flintstone", "Crane Operator", 5000.0) # Give Jim a raise jim.salary=8000.0
Now, adding some code to keep the payroll department informed of pay changes:
class Payroll def update( changed_employee ) puts("Cut a new check for #{changed_employee.name}!") puts("His salary is now #{changed_employee.salary}!") end end
class Employee attr_reader :name, :title attr_reader :salary def initialize( name, title, salary,payroll) @name = name @title = title @salary = salary @payroll = payroll end def salary=(new_salary) @salary = new_salary @payroll.update(self) end end
We can now change Jim's wages as follows:
payroll = Payroll.new jim = Employee.new('Jim', 'Crane Operator', 5000, payroll) jim.salary = 8000
And the payroll department will know about these changes. The output of the above code is:
Cut a new check for Jim!
His salary is now 8000!
Conclusion
References
[1]
[2]
[3]