CSC 379:Week 2, Group 1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Provisions of Creative Commons License: Added a little summary of how creative commons works)
Line 18: Line 18:
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"
|Creative Commons
|Creative Commons
|'''To the "user"'''
|
*Can block a large amount of spam
*Creator of work can grant specific permissions for re-use of work
*Low chance of blocking legitimate email
*Rights and conditions of others to use work are more clearly laid out
**Notification sent to blocked senders in some implementations
|
'''To the "creator"'''
*Must be careful to choose appropriate license to retain the desired amount of control over the work
*Action to take on spam is user-definable
*Users of Creative Commons-licensed works must be careful when combining works with different licenses
|'''To the "user"'''
*Some spam still can still get through
*Might block individuals running their own mail server
'''To the "creator"'''
*Requires processing at client/receiver-side for effective blocking
|Dude. That's unethical.
|Dude. That's unethical.
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"

Revision as of 20:10, 14 July 2007

Creative Commons

Overview

Provisions of Creative Commons License

Based upon copyright protections, the various forms of the creative commons licenses allow the creator of a work to declare "some rights reserved" instead of the usual "all rights reserved" associated with plain copyright. This allows the creator of the original work to grant certain permissions to those who wish to use the original work without the prospective user having to explicitly ask for permission. ((after text, link to creative commons website or some sub-site?))

Comparison to other common licenses

((table: benefits (to 'user' / to 'creator'), disadvantages (to 'user' / to 'creator'), why to use it?, ethical considerations))

License Advantages Disadvantages Ethical Considerations
Creative Commons
  • Creator of work can grant specific permissions for re-use of work
  • Rights and conditions of others to use work are more clearly laid out
  • Must be careful to choose appropriate license to retain the desired amount of control over the work
  • Users of Creative Commons-licensed works must be careful when combining works with different licenses
 Dude. That's unethical.
Basic Copyright To the "user"
  • Something

To the "creator"

  • Something else
 To the "user"
  • Something

To the "creator"

  • Something else
  • Ethics is crying
GPL To the "user"
  • Something

To the "creator"

  • Something
 To the "user"
  • Something else

To the "creator"

  • Something else again
 Dude. That's ethical.

Discussion Questions

Adoption of license

The Question
Should groups like media outlets who desire their content to be shared adopt licenses like creative commons to clarify and guarantee the protections they want to extend to the public?

Yes the groups should adopt it blah blah blah.

Some more stuff.

Blah blah blah.

Links (if applicable)

Ethical considerations / Obstacles to adoption

The Question
What ethical advantages and disadvantages are there for adopting Creative Commons licenses? What obstacles exist towards the adoption of Creative Commons licenses within the business community?

Ethical considerations of international usage

The Question
Copyright law differs between countries. Creative Commons has licenses that can be adapted to be compatible with the laws of many nations. What ethical considerations are there to a system of international copyright laws and/or agreements? Are licenses like Creative Commons viable alternatives to international agreements?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.expertiza.ncsu.edu/index.php?title=CSC_379:Week_2,_Group_1&oldid=1648"