Revision as of 23:19, 12 July 2007

Creative Commons

((after text, link to creative commons website or some sub-site?))

((table: benefits (to 'user' / to 'creator'), disadvantages (to 'user' / to 'creator'), why to use it?, ethical considerations))

License	Advantages	Disadvantages	Ethical Considerations
Creative Commons	To the "user" Can block a large amount of spam Low chance of blocking legitimate email Notification sent to blocked senders in some implementations	To the "user" Some spam still can still get through Might block individuals running their own mail server	Dude. That's unethical.
Creative Commons	To the "creator" Action to take on spam is user-definable	To the "creator" Requires processing at client/receiver-side for effective blocking	Dude. That's unethical.

The Question: Should groups like media outlets who desire their content to be shared adopt licenses like creative commons to clarify and guarantee the protections they want to extend to the public?

Yes the groups should adopt it blah blah blah.

Some more stuff.

Blah blah blah.

Links (if applicable)

The Question: What ethical advantages and disadvantages are there for adopting Creative Commons licenses? What obstacles exist towards the adoption of Creative Commons licenses within the business community?

The Question: Copyright law differs between countries. Creative Commons has licenses that can be adapted to be compatible with the laws of many nations. What ethical considerations are there to a system of international copyright laws and/or agreements? Are licenses like Creative Commons viable alternatives to international agreements?

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ((table: benefits (to 'user' / to 'creator'), disadvantages (to 'user' / to 'creator'), why to use it?, ethical considerations))
+{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2"
+! License
+! Advantages
+! Disadvantages
+! Ethical Considerations
+|-valign="top"
+<!----------------------------------------------------------------------------->
+| rowspan=2 | Creative Commons
+|'''To the "user"'''
+*Can block a large amount of spam
+*Low chance of blocking legitimate email
+**Notification sent to blocked senders in some implementations
+|'''To the "user"'''
+*Some spam still can still get through
+*Might block individuals running their own mail server
+| rowspan=2 | Dude. That's unethical.
+|-
+|'''To the "creator"'''
+*Action to take on spam is user-definable
+|'''To the "creator"'''
+*Requires processing at client/receiver-side for effective blocking
+|-
+|}
 ==Discussion Questions==