CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 2, Debate: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add of initial content)
 
 
Line 17: Line 17:
==Associated Links:==
==Associated Links:==


'''TBA'''
* [http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/511995 http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/511995]
 
* [http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/579 http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/579]
 
* [http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/the-inexact-science-behind-dmca-takedown-notices/ http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/the-inexact-science-behind-dmca-takedown-notices/]
 
* [http://www.mpaa.org/leksummaryMPA%20revised.pdf http://www.mpaa.org/leksummaryMPA%20revised.pdf]
 
* [http://global.bsa.org/idcglobalstudy2007/ http://global.bsa.org/idcglobalstudy2007/]

Latest revision as of 20:35, 16 July 2008

Debate Topic:

Will artists be compensated for their work if no one is defending copyright law?


Associated Questions:

  • Suppose copyright law was rendered useless by rampant copying of all copyrighted works with impunity, would artists lose the incentive to produce quality works?
  • Is it necessary to prohibit or limit the file-sharing of copyrighted works?
  • What kind of enforcement is justified? Can this be done while protecting the rights of users?
  • Music/Video/Software; does enforcement need to be different for different mediums?


Associated Links: