Talk:CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 1, Group 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:33, 15 July 2008

Hey guys, don't forget to discuss the ethical implications of the things you are writing about

Hey guys, here are some obvious things we need to fix for the resubmission after reading the reviews:

Need viewpoint statements from both the spammer point of view as well as the one getting spammed
Definitely need more in the area of talking about the ethical issues at hand
Need more embedded links and possibly examples of spamming situations

I'll work on the Viewpoints/Controversy section

--CJ

Revision as of 14:33, 15 July 2008 (view source) Cjsoques (talk \| contribs) (→‎Resubmission after viewing reviews) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:33, 15 July 2008 (view source) Cjsoques (talk \| contribs) (→‎Resubmission after viewing reviews) Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I'll work on the Viewpoints/Controversy section		I'll work on the Viewpoints/Controversy section

			--CJ