Talk:CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 1, Group 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Resubmission after viewing reviews) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Need viewpoint statements from both the spammer point of view as well as the one getting spammed | * Need viewpoint statements from both the spammer point of view as well as the one getting spammed | ||
* Definitely need more in the area of talking about the ethical issues at hand | * Definitely need more in the area of talking about the ethical issues at hand | ||
* Need more embedded links and possibly examples of spamming situations | * Need more embedded links and possibly examples of spamming situations | ||
I'll work on the Viewpoints/Controversy section | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 15 July 2008
Hey guys, don't forget to discuss the ethical implications of the things you are writing about
Resubmission after viewing reviews
Hey guys, here are some obvious things we need to fix for the resubmission after reading the reviews:
- Need viewpoint statements from both the spammer point of view as well as the one getting spammed
- Definitely need more in the area of talking about the ethical issues at hand
- Need more embedded links and possibly examples of spamming situations
I'll work on the Viewpoints/Controversy section