CSC 379:Week 1, Group 4: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reformatted a bit)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Internal Use Only ==
Group members:
Group members:
Nick Principe / naprinci@gmail.com / AIM: mahoubaka
Nick Principe / naprinci@gmail.com / AIM: mahoubaka
==Spam Prevention Techniques==


* block domains or even top-level domains "known" to be large senders of spam
* block domains or even top-level domains "known" to be large senders of spam
Line 28: Line 28:
[http://www.spamlaws.com/articles/usf.pdf huge paper on this subject]
[http://www.spamlaws.com/articles/usf.pdf huge paper on this subject]


===Comparison of Spam Prevention Techniques===
== Spam Prevention Techniques ==
 
=== Comparison of Techniques ===
{| border=1
{| border=1
! Technique Name
! Technique Name
Line 107: Line 109:
|}
|}


===Spam Prevention Technique Details===
=== Technique Details ===
*'''Block domains...'''
 
**Summary point 1
==== Block domains... =====
**Summary point 2
*Summary point 1
**Link 1
*Summary point 2
*'''Require users...'''
*Link 1
*'''Charge for email sent'''
 
==== Require users... =====
 
==== Charge for email sent ====

Revision as of 00:46, 7 July 2007

Internal Use Only

Group members: Nick Principe / naprinci@gmail.com / AIM: mahoubaka

huge paper on this subject

Spam Prevention Techniques

Comparison of Techniques

Technique Name Pros Cons Our Rating
Block domains of "known" spammers
  • Gets rid of a large amount of spam
  • Low chance of blocking legitimate email (sbl-faq)
    • Mechanism to allow legitimate sources to know they were blocked (sbl-faq)
  • Lots of spam still gets through (put in percent from sbl/sbl-faq)
x stars!
require users to request permission to send you e-mail (eg Earthlink spam blocker)
  • Robots cannot easily send spam
  • False identity doesn't work
  • Emergency emails don't send quickly
  • Time consuming to send short notes
  • Impossible to implement correctly
4
Charge for e-mail sent
  • Forces targeted selection
  • Defeats the purpose of email
  • Where does the money go?
4
opt-in for commercial email
  • Companies can send advertisements without sending spam
  • Users can freely restrict the influx of mail from their many online affiliations
  • There are many fraudulent emails in which the opt-out link sends you to an unwanted web page.
4
domain authentication
  • Very little spam gets through
  • Lots of false positives
  • Could be very difficult for mail servers to initiate contact (certificate negotation crap (see SSH/SSL))
  • Lots of infrastructure and therefore money involved for something as simple as a mail server
  • Hard for independents/individuals to set up their own mail server
4
bounties
  • Gets rid of big spammers with incentive
  • Possible deterrent
  • Costs government (tax-payers) money
4
The "goodmail" approach
  • Mass emails cost money so mass spammers don't work
  • Companies can bypass the spam filter by paying money
4
Bonds with escrow agencies pro con 4
client-side filtering pro
  • Only as good as user or algorithms/heuristics at identifying spam
4

Technique Details

Block domains... =

  • Summary point 1
  • Summary point 2
  • Link 1

Require users... =

Charge for email sent