CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2021 - E2125. Refactor review mapping helper.rb: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:


=== Background ===
=== Background ===
E2125. Refactor review_mapping_helper.rb
==== E2125. Refactor review_mapping_helper.rb ====
* Files involved: review_mapping_helper.rb
* Files involved: review_mapping_helper.rb
* What is wrong:
* What is wrong:
Line 17: Line 17:
# Read about cyclomatic complexity here.
# Read about cyclomatic complexity here.
# Fix all the methods having the issue with cyclomatic complexity, assignment branch condition size, extra commas and space or lack of it and assigning branching condition.
# Fix all the methods having the issue with cyclomatic complexity, assignment branch condition size, extra commas and space or lack of it and assigning branching condition.
Write test cases of any new code written. Test the existing functionality after refactoring
Write test cases of any new code written. Test the existing functionality after refactoring.


However, since in code climate it shows that all cyclomatic complexity was resolved, our main work was fixing the logic of the method "get_team_color".
However, since in code climate it shows that all cyclomatic complexity was resolved, our main work was fixing the logic of the method "get_team_color".

Revision as of 23:42, 26 October 2021

E2125. Refactor review mapping helper.rb

This page describes the Expertiza based OSS project.

Expertiza

Expertiza is an open-source project contributed by both the students and the faculty at NCSU. It is developed on Ruby-on-Rails and software to create reusable learning objects through peer review. Expertiza allows the instructor to create new assignments, customize new or existing assignments, and create a topic list for students to sign up. It also supports students to form teams for team projects and allows submission with almost any document type, including URLs and wiki pages.

Background

E2125. Refactor review_mapping_helper.rb

  • Files involved: review_mapping_helper.rb
  • What is wrong:
    • The review_mapping_helper.rb has methods that exceed the limit on lines of code Also, it is missing proper comments for each functionality. Cyclomatic complexity of most of the methods is way too high as per the standard defined in the Code Climate.
  • What needs to be done:
  1. Use Code Climate to do a diagnosis for Expertiza. Search for the issues involving the files mentioned above.
  2. Read about cyclomatic complexity here.
  3. Fix all the methods having the issue with cyclomatic complexity, assignment branch condition size, extra commas and space or lack of it and assigning branching condition.

Write test cases of any new code written. Test the existing functionality after refactoring.

However, since in code climate it shows that all cyclomatic complexity was resolved, our main work was fixing the logic of the method "get_team_color".

Modifications in review_mapping_helper.rb

get_team_color

The original code will not return the correct color, because when it is checking the grade for the reviewer, it is not checking the correct variable.

 def get_team_color(response_map)
    # Storing redundantly computed value in a variable
    assignment_created = @assignment.created_at

    # Storing redundantly computed value in a variable
    assignment_due_dates = DueDate.where(parent_id: response_map.reviewed_object_id)

    # Returning colour based on conditions
    if Response.exists?(map_id: response_map.id)
      if !response_map.try(:reviewer).try(:review_grade).grade_for_reviewer.nil?
        'brown'
      elsif response_for_each_round?(response_map)
        'blue'
      else
        check_submission_state(response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates, @assignment.num_review_rounds)
      end
    else
      'red'
    end
  end
check_submission_state

This method checks whether the team submit the project on time or not. (If there are no submission or the submission is not on time, it is reasonable that the reviewer cannot review the project). In addition, the submission time of a link should be checked by the last modified time of the webpage, not the moment the link itself is submitted.



 def check_submission_state(response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates, round)
    if submitted_within_round?(round, response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates)
      'purple'
    else
      link = submitted_hyperlink(round, response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates)
      if link.nil? or (link !~ %r{https*:\/\/wiki(.*)}) # can be extended for github links in future
        'green'
      else
        link_updated_at = get_link_updated_at(link)
        link_updated_since_last?(round, assignment_due_dates, link_updated_at) ? 'purple' : 'green'
      end
    end
  end


obtain_team_color

This method has been removed because it is running unnecessary loop.

Testing Details in review_mapping_helper.rb

RSpec


All 32 test cases are currently passing.

  1. In method get_team_color(response_map) in review mapping helper.rb: Only checking if the record exist is not enough, because all mapping records pre-exist with empty scores in it.
  2. The for loop for checking multiple submission stage is unnecesasry, so we removed obtain_team_color and call check_submission_state directly.
  3. Stubbing NET::HTTP to fix test cases that originally failed if calling the method get_link_updated_at.

Example test case:

 it 'color should be purple if submission link has been updated since due date for a specified round' do
      # deadline_right inspired from bookmark_review_spec
      allow(Net::HTTP).to receive(:get_response).and_return({'last-modified' => DateTime.now.in_time_zone})
      create(:deadline_right, name: 'No')
      create(:deadline_right, name: 'Late')
      create(:deadline_right, name: 'OK')

      response_map_with_reviewee = create(:review_response_map, reviewer: @reviewer, reviewee: @reviewee_with_assignment)

      create(:submission_record, assignment_id: @assignment.id, team_id: @reviewee_with_assignment.id, operation: 'Submit Hyperlink',
        content: 'https://wiki.archlinux.org/', created_at: DateTime.now.in_time_zone - 7.day)

      create(:assignment_due_date, assignment: @assignment, parent_id: @assignment.id, round: 1, due_at: DateTime.now.in_time_zone - 5.day)
      create(:assignment_due_date, assignment: @assignment, parent_id: @assignment.id, round: 2, due_at: DateTime.now.in_time_zone + 6.day)

      create(:response, response_map: response_map_with_reviewee)

      color = get_team_color(response_map_with_reviewee)
      expect(color).to eq('purple')
    end
  end

Peer Review Credentials

Username: instructor6
Password: password