CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2021 - E2113. Enhancements to review grader: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
====Test Plan==== | ====Test Plan==== | ||
#Login as | #Login using an instructor account, such as: instructor6 / password | ||
#Go to " | #Go to "Manage >> Assignments" and choose one assignment with reviews, i.e., "Program 1", and click on "View Reports". | ||
# | #There will be a dropdown selector to choose which report to view - select "Review report" from the dropdown, and click "View". | ||
# | |||
#Check if the reviewer names and team names are all anonymized. | #''Check if the reviewer names and team names are all anonymized.'' | ||
#Check if the checkbox items are displayed as expected. | #''Check if the checkbox items are displayed as expected.'' | ||
#Check if column widths are appropriate.. | #''Check if column widths are appropriate..'' | ||
#Check if “Review: Round1” is changed to “Review Round 1”. | #''Check if “Review: Round1” is changed to “Review Round 1”.'' | ||
===The Summary Page=== | ===The Summary Page=== | ||
====Issue Description==== | ====Issue Description==== | ||
Revision as of 19:37, 31 March 2021
Background
When the staff grade reviews, they are viewed in the review-grader interface. The staff can assign the score and provide feedback using the textboxes provided in the right columns of the table. The staff are also allowed to read the reviews in the summary view.
There appears to be certain sections of the main review-grader page as well as the summary page that are not working correctly or there is a desire for them to be updated. These issues have to do with calculation of a student's score / average score, the visual representation of the scores, efficient usage of space within the view, and a need for rows of the table(s) to be numbered. We go into further depth about the issues later in this document.
Problem Statement
Certain aspects of the UI and minor score calculation logic of the review grader system in Expertiza need to be enhanced/refactored. These issues are not major and mainly have to do with UI, and therefore should not require the development of new unit tests. Below is a detailed description of actionable issues that will be addressed in this work.
The Main Review-Grader Page
Issue Description
Test Plan
- Login using an instructor account, such as: instructor6 / password
- Go to "Manage >> Assignments" and choose one assignment with reviews, i.e., "Program 1", and click on "View Reports".
- There will be a dropdown selector to choose which report to view - select "Review report" from the dropdown, and click "View".
- Check if the reviewer names and team names are all anonymized.
- Check if the checkbox items are displayed as expected.
- Check if column widths are appropriate..
- Check if “Review: Round1” is changed to “Review Round 1”.