CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2020 - E2083. Revision planning tool E2016: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:


====Scores Page====
====Scores Page====
[[File:View_Scores_Wireframe.png]]


===Control Flow Diagram===
===Control Flow Diagram===

Revision as of 20:33, 20 October 2020

This page provides a description of the Expertiza based OSS project.

Introduction

Rounds of peer reviews may be implemented between submissions for assignments on Expertiza. In order to better track the implementation of reviewer's suggestions, a Revision Planning Tool should be implemented.

Problem Statement

In the first round of Expertiza reviews, we ask reviewers to give authors some guidance on how to improve their work. Then in the second round, reviewers rate how well authors have followed their suggestions. We could carry the interaction one step further if we asked authors to make up a revision plan based on the first-round reviews. That is, authors would say what they were planning to do to improve their work. Then second-round reviewers would assess how well they did it. In essence, this means that authors would be adding criteria to the second-round rubric that applied only to their submission. We are interested in having this implemented and used in a class so that we can study its effect.

Design

Database Design

Proposed Changes

User Interface

Submission Page

Editing the Revision Plan Questionnaire

Wireframe of Revision Plan Editing Page



Scores Page

Control Flow Diagram

Team Members

Chaitanya Mehta (cmehta)
Darby Madewell (demadewe)
Dongni Yang (dyang23)
Sidharth Mehta (smehta22)
Mentor: Yulin Zhang (yzhan114)