E1913 refactor review mapping helper: Difference between revisions
m (→Introduction) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
===Comments added to various functions=== | ===Comments added to various functions=== | ||
There were several methods which didn't have any comments or the comments weren't | There were several methods which didn't have any comments or the comments weren't meaningful. In all those cases, comments have been added or changed which are mentioned as follows: | ||
<pre> | |||
# gets the review score awarded based on each round of the review | |||
def get_each_round_score_awarded_for_review_report(reviewer_id, team_id) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# gets minimum, maximum and average value for all the reviews | |||
def get_min_max_avg_value_for_review_report(round, team_id) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# sorts the reviewers by the average volume of reviews in each round, in descending order | |||
def sort_reviewer_by_review_volume_desc | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# displays all the average scores in round 1, 2 and 3 | |||
def display_volume_metric(overall_avg_vol, avg_vol_in_round_1, avg_vol_in_round_2, avg_vol_in_round_3) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# moves data of reviews in each round from a current round | |||
def initialize_chart_elements(reviewer) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# The data of all the reviews is displayed in the form of a bar chart | |||
def display_volume_metric_chart(reviewer) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
#For assignments with 1 team member, the following method returns user's fullname else it returns "team name" that a particular reviewee belongs to. | |||
def get_team_reviewed_link_name(max_team_size, response, reviewee_id) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
#if the current stage is "submission" or "review", function returns the current round number otherwise if the current stage is "Finished" or "metareview", function returns the number of rounds of review completed | |||
def get_current_round_for_review_report(reviewer_id) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# gets the response map data such as reviewer id, reviewd object id and type for the review report | |||
def get_data_for_review_report(reviewed_object_id, reviewer_id, type) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# gets the team name's color according to review and assignment submission status | |||
def get_team_name_color_in_review_report(response_map) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# checks if a review was submitted in every round and gives the total responses count | |||
def response_for_each_round?(response_map) | |||
</pre> | |||
<pre> | |||
# returns hyperlink of the assignment that has been submitted on the due date | |||
def submitted_hyperlink(round, response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates) | |||
</pre> | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 25 March 2019
Introduction
This page gives a description of the changes made for the review_mapping_helper.rb of Expertiza based OSS project.
Expertiza Background
Expertiza is a web application where students can submit and peer-review learning objects (articles, codes, websites, etc). Instructors add and grade the assignments submitted by students to Expertiza. Students can be assigned in teams based on their selection of the topics. It has functionalities such as peer reviews in which students can provide feedback on other's work which helps peer in better developing the project. It is supported by the National Science Foundation.
Problem Statement
The review_mapping_helper.rb has multiple functions with a wrong naming convention, they are classic examples of bad function names. These functions are to be refactored accordingly. Few of the variables names used in the method must also be refactored to make it more relevant and understandable. In addition, some function's code is to be optimized to ensure that it follows DRY principle. Tests must be written for the functions which are modified. Also, comments must be added to all functions of the file. The create_report_table_header function contains HTML code which should be ideally placed in the view as partials, which will allow to easily reuse the code in Rails application.
Implementation
Flowchart
Refactored method names
All the method names that are refactored are mentioned below-
Before:
get_each_round_review_and_feedback_response_map_for_feedback_report
After:
TO-DO
Before:
get_certain_round_review_and_feedback_response_map_for_feedback_report
After:
TO-DO
Before:
get_team_name_color_in_review_report
After:
get_review_report_team_color
Before:
get_current_round_for_review_report
After:
get_curr_round_review_report
Before:
get_each_round_score_awarded_for_review_report
After:
get_review_score
Before:
get_min_max_avg_value_for_review_report
After:
get_review_metrics
Comments added to various functions
There were several methods which didn't have any comments or the comments weren't meaningful. In all those cases, comments have been added or changed which are mentioned as follows:
# gets the review score awarded based on each round of the review def get_each_round_score_awarded_for_review_report(reviewer_id, team_id)
# gets minimum, maximum and average value for all the reviews def get_min_max_avg_value_for_review_report(round, team_id)
# sorts the reviewers by the average volume of reviews in each round, in descending order def sort_reviewer_by_review_volume_desc
# displays all the average scores in round 1, 2 and 3 def display_volume_metric(overall_avg_vol, avg_vol_in_round_1, avg_vol_in_round_2, avg_vol_in_round_3)
# moves data of reviews in each round from a current round def initialize_chart_elements(reviewer)
# The data of all the reviews is displayed in the form of a bar chart def display_volume_metric_chart(reviewer)
#For assignments with 1 team member, the following method returns user's fullname else it returns "team name" that a particular reviewee belongs to. def get_team_reviewed_link_name(max_team_size, response, reviewee_id)
#if the current stage is "submission" or "review", function returns the current round number otherwise if the current stage is "Finished" or "metareview", function returns the number of rounds of review completed def get_current_round_for_review_report(reviewer_id)
# gets the response map data such as reviewer id, reviewd object id and type for the review report def get_data_for_review_report(reviewed_object_id, reviewer_id, type)
# gets the team name's color according to review and assignment submission status def get_team_name_color_in_review_report(response_map)
# checks if a review was submitted in every round and gives the total responses count def response_for_each_round?(response_map)
# returns hyperlink of the assignment that has been submitted on the due date def submitted_hyperlink(round, response_map, assignment_created, assignment_due_dates)
Function placed in the view as partials
The following function has been removed from the review_mapping_helper.rb and added to the views as partials:
def create_report_table_header(headers = {}) table_header = "<div class = 'reviewreport'>\ <table width='100% cellspacing='0' cellpadding='2' border='0' class='table table-striped'>\ <tr bgcolor='#CCCCCC'>" headers.each do |header, percentage| table_header += if percentage "<th width = #{percentage}>\ #{header.humanize}\ </th>" else "<th>\ #{header.humanize}\ </th>" end end table_header += "</tr>" table_header.html_safe end
Testing
Manual Testing
RSpec Testing
Given below are the tests which are written for the functions that are modified: