CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki1b 6 c1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== <b>Singleton Pattern</b> == | == <b>Singleton Pattern</b> == | ||
The Singleton pattern is a design pattern used to insure the existence of a single instance of a class in the run time. It constructs the object once and returns a reference to this object every time thereafter. In a multithreading environment, special care should be taken, as it will be illustrated later in this page. | The Singleton pattern is a design pattern used to insure the existence of a single instance of a class in the run time. It constructs the object once and returns a reference to this object every time thereafter. In a multithreading environment, special care should be taken, as it will be illustrated later in this page. | ||
__TOC__ | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 1 October 2007
Singleton Pattern
The Singleton pattern is a design pattern used to insure the existence of a single instance of a class in the run time. It constructs the object once and returns a reference to this object every time thereafter. In a multithreading environment, special care should be taken, as it will be illustrated later in this page.
Implementation
The Singleton pattern is implemented by
- Create a class with a method which will create a new instance of the class (If one doesn't already exist)
- The constructor of this class is turned to private or protected
- Another public function is used to call this constructor.
- If the object is not initialized yet (object == null) it calls the constructor and returns a reference else it will just return a reference.
In multithreading environment, a synchronized command should be used so not every thread in the program can initialize its own instance of the singleton class.
Example Implementations
To demonstrate further let us consider programs that implement a logger in Java and then in Ruby.
Java
public class LoggerSingleton { private static LoggerSingleton instance = null; private LoggerSingleton() { // Exists only to defeat instantiation. } public static LoggerSingleton getInstance() { if(instance == null) { instance = new LoggerSingleton(); } return instance; } // add other attributes }
Ruby
require 'singleton' class LoggerSingleton include Singleton end
Test singletons
The following coding is to test singleton class
Java
import junit.framework.Assert; import junit.framework.TestCase; public class TestSingleton extends TestCase { private LoggerSingleton logger1 = null, logger2 = null; public TestSingleton(String name) { super(name); } public void setUp() { logger1 = LoggerSingleton.getInstance(); logger2 = LoggerSingleton.getInstance(); } public void testUnique() { System.out.println(logger1); System.out.println(logger2); Assert.assertEquals(true, logger1 == logger2); } }
Ruby
def test_singleton class << OnlyOne.instance def reset # reset state end end OnlyOne.instance.modify_state OnlyOne.instance.reset end
Java versus Ruby
Java and Ruby have their similarities and their differences so lets compare the two languages.
Ruby | Java |
Dynamically typed | Statically typed |
Purely object oriented | Distinction between primitives and object types |
No classes required, closures are good enough | A class is required for each strategy implementation |
Syntactic regular-expression support | Not present |
nil is an object => no null-pointer exceptions | null means no reference to object |
Possible to capture calls to non-existent methods using method_missing | Not possible |
All classes are open to extension | Classes cannot be extended at run time |
Reflection is easy | Reflection is much more verbose |
Blocks are closures | Anonymous inner functions are closures but less powerful |
Conclusion
Java doesn’t contain singleton pattern in the language itself, although implementation for the pattern is still possible. While in Ruby the singleton pattern is in the language itself, which became possible since Ruby is a dynamic language through singleton module.