CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2007/wiki1b 6 c1: Difference between revisions

From Expertiza_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 86: Line 86:


{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
|-
 
|width="200pt"|This column is 200 points wide
|width="300pt"|This column is 300 points wide
|-
|-
|Ruby ||  Java
|Ruby ||  Java
|-
|Interpreted  ||  Compiled to byte code
|Interpreted  ||  Compiled to byte code
|-
|Dynamically typed  ||  Statically typed
|Dynamically typed  ||  Statically typed
|-
|Purely object oriented ||  Distinction between primitives and object types
|Purely object oriented ||  Distinction between primitives and object types
|-
|Unbounded polymorphism ||  Inheritance and Interfaces
|Unbounded polymorphism ||  Inheritance and Interfaces
|-
|Multiple inheritance through mixins  ||  Interfaces
|Multiple inheritance through mixins  ||  Interfaces
|-
|Syntactic regular-expression support  ||  Not present  (can do the same thing in Java by creating a pattern with java.util.regex, etc.)
|Syntactic regular-expression support  ||  Not present  (can do the same thing in Java by creating a pattern with java.util.regex, etc.)
|-
|Syntactic support for arrays and hashes  ||  Arrays and hashes  (HashMap, Hashtable) present in Collections; no special syntax
|Syntactic support for arrays and hashes  ||  Arrays and hashes  (HashMap, Hashtable) present in Collections; no special syntax
|-
|nil is an object => no null-pointer exceptions  ||  null means no reference to object  
|nil is an object => no null-pointer exceptions  ||  null means no reference to object  
|-
|Everything is a message  ||  Method invocations are compiled, not treated as messages at run time.
|Everything is a message  ||  Method invocations are compiled, not treated as messages at run time.
|-
|Possible to capture calls to non-existent methods using method_missing  ||  Not possible  
|Possible to capture calls to non-existent methods using method_missing  ||  Not possible  
|-
|All classes are open to extension  ||  Classes cannot be extended at run time
|All classes are open to extension  ||  Classes cannot be extended at run time
|-
|Dynamic evaluation of code using eval  ||  Not possible easily
|Dynamic evaluation of code using eval  ||  Not possible easily
|-
|Reflection is easy  ||  Reflection is much more verbose  
|Reflection is easy  ||  Reflection is much more verbose  
|-
|Blocks are closures  ||  Anonymous inner functions are closures but less powerful
|Blocks are closures  ||  Anonymous inner functions are closures but less powerful
|}
|}

Revision as of 16:57, 1 October 2007

Singleton Pattern

The Singleton pattern is a design pattern used to insure the existence of a single instance of a class in the run time. It constructs the object once and returns a reference to this object every time thereafter. In a multithreading environment, special care should be taken, as it will be illustrated later in this page.


Implementation

The Singleton pattern is implemented by
- Create a class with a method which will create a new instance of the class (If one doesn't already exist)
- The constructor of this class is turned to private or protected
- Another public function is used to call this constructor.
- If the object is not initialized yet (object == null) it calls the constructor and returns a reference else it will just return a reference.


In multithreading environment, a synchronized command should be used so not every thread in the program can initialize its own instance of the singleton class.

Example Implementations

To demonstrate further let us consider programs that implement a logger in Java and then in Ruby.


Java


public class LoggerSingleton {
  private static LoggerSingleton instance = null;
  private LoggerSingleton() {
     // Exists only to defeat instantiation.
  }
  public static LoggerSingleton getInstance() {
     if(instance == null) {
        instance = new LoggerSingleton();
     }
     return instance;
  }
  // add other attributes
}


Ruby


require 'singleton' 
class LoggerSingleton
  include Singleton 
end 


Test singletons

Following a code to test singleton class in Java:


import junit.framework.Assert; 
import junit.framework.TestCase; 
public class TestSingleton extends TestCase {
 private LoggerSingleton logger1 = null, logger2 = null;
 public TestSingleton(String name) {
   super(name);
 }
 public void setUp() {
       logger1 = LoggerSingleton.getInstance();
       logger2 = LoggerSingleton.getInstance();
  }
 public void testUnique() {
       System.out.println(logger1);
       System.out.println(logger2);
       Assert.assertEquals(true, logger1 == logger2);
      }
   }

in ruby;

def test_singleton
 class << OnlyOne.instance
   def reset
     # reset state
   end
 end
 OnlyOne.instance.modify_state
 OnlyOne.instance.reset
end


Java versus Ruby

Java and Ruby have their similarities and their differences so lets compare the two languages.

Ruby Java
Interpreted Compiled to byte code
Dynamically typed Statically typed
Purely object oriented Distinction between primitives and object types
Unbounded polymorphism Inheritance and Interfaces
Multiple inheritance through mixins Interfaces
Syntactic regular-expression support Not present (can do the same thing in Java by creating a pattern with java.util.regex, etc.)
Syntactic support for arrays and hashes Arrays and hashes (HashMap, Hashtable) present in Collections; no special syntax
nil is an object => no null-pointer exceptions null means no reference to object
Everything is a message Method invocations are compiled, not treated as messages at run time.
Possible to capture calls to non-existent methods using method_missing Not possible
All classes are open to extension Classes cannot be extended at run time
Dynamic evaluation of code using eval Not possible easily
Reflection is easy Reflection is much more verbose
Blocks are closures Anonymous inner functions are closures but less powerful


Conclusion

Java doesn’t contain singleton pattern in the language itself, although implementation for the pattern is still possible. While in Ruby the singleton pattern is in the language itself, which became possible since Ruby is a dynamic language through singleton module.