Talk:KCU/03/Lady Knights: Difference between revisions
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
3. Make clearer while interacting with your dialog partners how you would evaluate their views & arguments. For instance, Pack gives a lot of disputable claims & has a view that is not very compatible with most of the rest of what you write & what you found in other dialog partners. You will need to bring in a counter-weight to Pack if you believe that his claims are misleading. | 3. Make clearer while interacting with your dialog partners how you would evaluate their views & arguments. For instance, Pack gives a lot of disputable claims & has a view that is not very compatible with most of the rest of what you write & what you found in other dialog partners. You will need to bring in a counter-weight to Pack if you believe that his claims are misleading. | ||
4. Improve the formatting--see the Editing help link at the bottom of the editing page for instructions | 4. Improve the formatting--see the Editing help link at the bottom of the editing page for instructions. I cleaned up the most problematic long horizontal lines for you. Basically, starting a new line after each sentence helps keep the formatting cleaner in a wiki, if you have copied & pasted in from elsewhere. |
Revision as of 12:14, 27 September 2007
Instructor Feedback on First Draft
As a first draft, this contribution falls short. Even though you have a lot of information & sources (good job on that!), the work has not been organized & revised into a clear, readable form. If this were submitted for the final draft, it would pass with around a C grade. On the other hand, you have done some very good work gathering dialog partners & in taking notes on those resources.
Things to work on:
1. Organize your information by writing your own explanatory & summarizing paragraphs & incorporating your dialog partners into your own writing
2. Expand your treatment of all biblical passages that shed light on the issue of the Trinity--organize & streamline the discussion at the same time
3. Make clearer while interacting with your dialog partners how you would evaluate their views & arguments. For instance, Pack gives a lot of disputable claims & has a view that is not very compatible with most of the rest of what you write & what you found in other dialog partners. You will need to bring in a counter-weight to Pack if you believe that his claims are misleading.
4. Improve the formatting--see the Editing help link at the bottom of the editing page for instructions. I cleaned up the most problematic long horizontal lines for you. Basically, starting a new line after each sentence helps keep the formatting cleaner in a wiki, if you have copied & pasted in from elsewhere.