Talk:KCU/03/SMAJ: Difference between revisions
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rtan@kcu.edu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series. | 4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series. | ||
5. Clean up the formatting | |||
Revision as of 02:16, 27 September 2007
Instructor Feedback on First Draft
As a first draft, this contribution falls short. (This would not pass if submitted for the final draft.) You do have some promising sources. Stephanie's source, John Stott's The Cross of Christ, is the best one I saw that you used. Mildred's paragraph shows some promise, but needs to be greatly expanded. The other outlines each need to be developed.
Things to work on:
1. Actually write paragraphs that incorporate works like Stott's The Cross of Christ in your discussion, but that are mainly your own discussion.
2. Bring in more sources like Stott's book
3. Look up more of the biblical evidence
4. Look up technical commentaries on the biblical evidence: e.g., commentaries from the NIV Application Commentary Series, the Word Biblical Commentary Series, the New International Commentary on the New Testament Series, &/or the Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament Series.
5. Clean up the formatting