CSC/ECE 506 Fall 2007/wiki1 5 1008

Section 1.1.4 Supercomputers

Supercomputing has become a very important part of many fields. These include industry, scientific, defense, and academia. Over the last 10 years, there has been a noticeable shift from the vector processing supercomputers and the massively parallel processing (MPP) model toward the cluster. The main reason for the shift is cost. A vector processor is a specialty piece of equipment, and companies must "tool up" in order to produce such a processor. With the MPP, a company uses a specialty processor that is produced in greater numbers but is still expensive. With the cluster, a developer can produce a very fast and reliable system with common off the shelf technology, or COTS for short. Over the last 10 years, the trend for the Top500 has shown that these cluster systems are becoming more popular and faster than their specialty counterparts.

Benchmarks

Up until recently, the LINPACK benchmark has been the favored method of benchmarking a supercomputing system. This benchmark works by solving dense systems of linear equations (top500.org). This benchmark only tests one segment of the performance of the computing system, but since it has been around for so long, it gives a good historical reference (Culler and Singh). The Linpack measures the amount of Floating point Operations Per Second, or FLOPS, a system can produce. It was written to perform best on vector processor based systems. In recent years, the new LAPACK benchmark has gained favor. It is written to more efficiently run on today’s architectures (Wikipedia). This benchmark uses linear equations, least squares of linear systems, eigenvalue problems, and Housholder transforms to benchmark the system (Wikipedia). However, the LINPACK is still used to benchmark systems for historical reference. The graph below shows a representative sample of supercomputers as compared to microprocessors. The graph was constructed using information off of top500.org and netlib.org.

LINPACK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAPACK
LAPACK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAPACK
Below the graph you find a list of systems used.

NOTE: The Microprocessors listed are not generally the same as in the supercomputing system. Below is the list of system and processors used in the sample

year /Supercomputer /Microprocessor
1996 /Cray T94 /DEC 8200
1997 /Cray T3e900 /IBM Power2/990 71.5mhz
1998 /Cray T3e1200 /MIPS R10000
1999 /ASCI Blue /IBM Power3
2000 /SP Power3 375 /Alpha EV5
2001 /Alpha Server SC45 /Fujitsu vpp800
2002 /MCR Linux Cluster /NEC
2003 /VT AppleG5 Cluster /Cray X1 800mhz
2004 /Eserver Bladecenter Cluster /IBM Power4 1.5Ghz
2005 /Poweredge1850 Cluster /AMD x86_64
2006 /Nova Scale 5160 /Intel Xeon 3.8 Ghz
2007 /Cray Red Storm /NEC SC 811

The graph above shows the trend of supercomputing power measured against individual processing power. The processors and suercomputing systems are chosen at random and are used as a sample. Looking at the graph, you can see that both lines are trending upward. If you were to take the individual processor out of a supercomputing system and do a comparison against one of the individual processors listed, you would see that the individual processor is actually more powerful.

Current Trend

The trend in supercomputing is going in the direction of the cluster. These can be broken up into two types with a very small difference. Clustered computing involves many small systems usually with 1 processor, which are linked together with some sort of high speed network interface. This is generally gigabit ethernet or infiniband. A good example of a cluster supercomputer would be the NCSA Dell PowerEdge 1955 cluster that was built. There is also the constellation. This involves taking smaller systems with 2 or more processors and linking them together with some sort of high speed interface. Again this can be either gigabit ethernet or infiniband. An example of the constellation system would be the Telecom Italia HP Superdome875 HyperPlex. The trend from 1997 until the current year on the top 500 has started to overwhelmingly favor the cluster. The reason for the preference is the cost involved. Figure 1.12 clearly shows the trend in the industry and is based on the current information from the Top500 site. http://www.top500.org/lists/2007/06

Cluster Computing

Cluster computing is very prominate in the current list of the Top500. The trend over the last ten years has moved away from a specialized compute system to a more off the shelf, cheaper, cluster system. These systems are very cost effective and give a lot more bang for the buck then a specialized vector processor or MPP based system. These systems come in severl flavors all with slight differences.

HA Load Balanceing HPC Grid Credt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAPACK
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK
http://www.top500.org/project/linpack
http://www.netlib.org
http://www.netlib.org/utk/people/JackDongarra/faq-linpack.html
David E. Culler, Jaswinder Pal Singh, and Anoop Gupta, "Parallel Computer Architecture" 1999 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.