CSC/ECE 506 Fall 2007: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Topics) |
(→Topics) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Sections 1.1 and 1.1.2 | * Sections 1.1 and 1.1.2 | ||
** Update performance trends in multiprocessors. | ** Update performance trends in multiprocessors. | ||
* Section 1.1.1, first half: Scientific/engineering application trends | * Section 1.1.1, first half: Scientific/engineering application trends | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
** How much memory, processor time, etc.? | ** How much memory, processor time, etc.? | ||
** How high is the speedup? | ** How high is the speedup? | ||
* Section 1.1.1, second half: Commercial application trends | * Section 1.1.1, second half: Commercial application trends | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
** How much memory, processor time, etc.? | ** How much memory, processor time, etc.? | ||
** How high is the speedup? | ** How high is the speedup? | ||
* Section 1.1.3: Architectural trends | * Section 1.1.3: Architectural trends | ||
| Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
** Update Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007. | ** Update Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007. | ||
[http://pg-server.csc.ncsu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/CSC/ECE_506_Fall_2007/wiki1_4_a1 Architectural Trends]- This summary give a detail observation of architectural trends. It also highlights the concepts of VLIW(Very Long Instruction Word), Multi-threading, Multi-core CPUs, and Speculative Execution. It also updates Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007. | [http://pg-server.csc.ncsu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/CSC/ECE_506_Fall_2007/wiki1_4_a1 Architectural Trends]- This summary give a detail observation of architectural trends. It also highlights the concepts of VLIW(Very Long Instruction Word), Multi-threading, Multi-core CPUs, and Speculative Execution. It also updates Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007. | ||
* Section 1.1.4: Supercomputers | * Section 1.1.4: Supercomputers | ||
** Compare current supercomputers with those of 10 yrs. ago. | ** Compare current supercomputers with those of 10 yrs. ago. | ||
** Update Figures 1.10 to 1.12 with new data points. For 1.12, consult top500.org. | ** Update Figures 1.10 to 1.12 with new data points. For 1.12, consult top500.org. | ||
* Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.4: Communication architecture | * Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.4: Communication architecture | ||
| Line 40: | Line 45: | ||
** How has data parallelism found its way into shared-memory and message-passing machines? An early example would be MMX. | ** How has data parallelism found its way into shared-memory and message-passing machines? An early example would be MMX. | ||
** Would you change the number of layers in Fig. 1.13? | ** Would you change the number of layers in Fig. 1.13? | ||
* Section 1.2.2: Shared address space | * Section 1.2.2: Shared address space | ||
| Line 46: | Line 52: | ||
** What is the size and capacity of current SMPs? | ** What is the size and capacity of current SMPs? | ||
** How have supercomputers evolved since the Cray T3E? | ** How have supercomputers evolved since the Cray T3E? | ||
* Section 1.2.3: Message passing | * Section 1.2.3: Message passing | ||
| Line 56: | Line 63: | ||
* Section 1.2.5: Trends in vector processing and array processing. | * Section 1.2.5: Trends in vector processing and array processing. | ||
** New machines have recently been announced. Why will this be an important architectural dimension in the coming years? | ** New machines have recently been announced. Why will this be an important architectural dimension in the coming years? | ||
* Section 1.2.6 | * Section 1.2.6 | ||
** New developments in dataflow and systolic architectures, if any. | ** New developments in dataflow and systolic architectures, if any. | ||
** Or if not, why are these styles not evolving with time? | ** Or if not, why are these styles not evolving with time? | ||
* Sections 1.3.1 and 1.3.2: Communication and programming model | * Sections 1.3.1 and 1.3.2: Communication and programming model | ||
| Line 65: | Line 74: | ||
** Have new kinds of synchronization operations been developed? | ** Have new kinds of synchronization operations been developed? | ||
** I doubt that other topics covered in these sections have changed much, but do check. | ** I doubt that other topics covered in these sections have changed much, but do check. | ||
* Sections 1.3.3 and 1.3.4: Most changes here are probably related to performance metrics. | * Sections 1.3.3 and 1.3.4: Most changes here are probably related to performance metrics. | ||
** Cite other models for measuring artifacts such as data-transfer time, overhead, occupancy, and communication cost. Focus on the models that are most useful in practice. | ** Cite other models for measuring artifacts such as data-transfer time, overhead, occupancy, and communication cost. Focus on the models that are most useful in practice. | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 9 February 2009
Formatting Resources
Formatting Help Guide from MetaWiki
Peer-reviewed Assignment 1
Important Dates
- 08/31/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 Selection
- 09/05/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 Submission
- 09/07/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 First feedback
- 09/10/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 Resubmission
- 09/12/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 Final review
- 09/14/2007 Peer-reviewed 1 Review of review
Topics
- Sections 1.1 and 1.1.2
- Update performance trends in multiprocessors.
- Section 1.1.1, first half: Scientific/engineering application trends
- What characterizes present-day applications?
- How much memory, processor time, etc.?
- How high is the speedup?
- Section 1.1.1, second half: Commercial application trends
- What characterizes present-day applications?
- How much memory, processor time, etc.?
- How high is the speedup?
- Section 1.1.3: Architectural trends
- How have architectures changed in the past 10 years?
- Update Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007.
Architectural Trends- This summary give a detail observation of architectural trends. It also highlights the concepts of VLIW(Very Long Instruction Word), Multi-threading, Multi-core CPUs, and Speculative Execution. It also updates Figs. 1.8 and 1.9 with new points, for 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2007.
- Section 1.1.4: Supercomputers
- Compare current supercomputers with those of 10 yrs. ago.
- Update Figures 1.10 to 1.12 with new data points. For 1.12, consult top500.org.
- Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.4: Communication architecture
- Trends in last 10 years.
- How has data parallelism found its way into shared-memory and message-passing machines? An early example would be MMX.
- Would you change the number of layers in Fig. 1.13?
- Section 1.2.2: Shared address space
- Any changes in the organization of address spaces in the last 10 years?
- Are the interconnection structures different in new computers now than they were 10 years ago?
- What is the size and capacity of current SMPs?
- How have supercomputers evolved since the Cray T3E?
- Section 1.2.3: Message passing
- Are blade servers an extension of message passing?
- How have blade architectures evolved over the past 10 years?
Message Passing Summary This summary highlights the typical structure, advantages and gives a detailed introduction of what message passing is.
- Section 1.2.5: Trends in vector processing and array processing.
- New machines have recently been announced. Why will this be an important architectural dimension in the coming years?
- Section 1.2.6
- New developments in dataflow and systolic architectures, if any.
- Or if not, why are these styles not evolving with time?
- Sections 1.3.1 and 1.3.2: Communication and programming model
- How have reordering strategies evolved to accommodate larger multicomputers?
- Have new kinds of synchronization operations been developed?
- I doubt that other topics covered in these sections have changed much, but do check.
- Sections 1.3.3 and 1.3.4: Most changes here are probably related to performance metrics.
- Cite other models for measuring artifacts such as data-transfer time, overhead, occupancy, and communication cost. Focus on the models that are most useful in practice.