CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 4, Group 4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2008-07-13-printer_N.htm | * http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2008-07-13-printer_N.htm | ||
* http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/ | * http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/ | ||
http://www.eff.org/pages/list-printers-which-do-or-do-not-display-tracking-dots |
Revision as of 22:21, 30 July 2008
What if every page you print from a color printer were labeled with a hidden code, detailing the printer the page was printed from, the date of printing and the time of printing, down to the minute? What if this feature was intentionally hidden from the user and could not be disabled? What if the code could be viewed and decoded by anyone, not just law enforcement? These hidden tracking codes exist – examine the ethical considerations they pose. Should users be informed of the feature? Should users be able to disable the feature? Develop ethical arguments for both positions.
- http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2008-07-13-printer_N.htm
- http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/printers/docucolor/
http://www.eff.org/pages/list-printers-which-do-or-do-not-display-tracking-dots