CSC 379 SUM2008:Week 1, Group 4: Difference between revisions
m (Client Side/Captchas) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Fighting against spam is difficult when its countermeasures come at a cost as well. E-mail is not just storage; much resources must be devoted to its processing, and the cost of efforts from virus scans of content to filtering all can be significant. Aggressive countermeasures have a negative impact on productivity, when the number of “false positives” is too great (legitimate emails incorrectly filed as spam). Examine the breadth of countermeasures available to combat spam, providing a brief review of the ethical considerations each raise, and links to online resources that cite specific instances or effects of each. | Fighting against spam is difficult when its countermeasures come at a cost as well. E-mail is not just storage; much resources must be devoted to its processing, and the cost of efforts from virus scans of content to filtering all can be significant. Aggressive countermeasures have a negative impact on productivity, when the number of “false positives” is too great (legitimate emails incorrectly filed as spam). Examine the breadth of countermeasures available to combat spam, providing a brief review of the ethical considerations each raise, and links to online resources that cite specific instances or effects of each. | ||
=== | ==Client-Side Spam Filters== | ||
Many popular email systems (such as gmail and ncsu's webmail) now provide client-side filtering of emails that are determined to be spam. These "filters" work by scanning emails for spam-related phrases such as "offer" or "male enhancement!!11!11!1" and quarantine emails that meet these pre-determined conditions. The obvious negative of this system is the possibility of legitimate emails being missed/trashed because they accidentally met the conditions to be considered spam. The major benefit of client-side filtering is the ability of the user to set the conditions rather than a corporate entity where censorship might come into play. | |||
==Captchas (Image Recognition Logins)== | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 9 July 2008
The Effects of Spam-Countermeasures
Fighting against spam is difficult when its countermeasures come at a cost as well. E-mail is not just storage; much resources must be devoted to its processing, and the cost of efforts from virus scans of content to filtering all can be significant. Aggressive countermeasures have a negative impact on productivity, when the number of “false positives” is too great (legitimate emails incorrectly filed as spam). Examine the breadth of countermeasures available to combat spam, providing a brief review of the ethical considerations each raise, and links to online resources that cite specific instances or effects of each.
Client-Side Spam Filters
Many popular email systems (such as gmail and ncsu's webmail) now provide client-side filtering of emails that are determined to be spam. These "filters" work by scanning emails for spam-related phrases such as "offer" or "male enhancement!!11!11!1" and quarantine emails that meet these pre-determined conditions. The obvious negative of this system is the possibility of legitimate emails being missed/trashed because they accidentally met the conditions to be considered spam. The major benefit of client-side filtering is the ability of the user to set the conditions rather than a corporate entity where censorship might come into play.