CSC 379:Week 1, Group 4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*Low chance of blocking legitimate email (sbl-faq) | *Low chance of blocking legitimate email (sbl-faq) | ||
**Mechanism to allow legitimate sources to know they were blocked (sbl-faq) | **Mechanism to allow legitimate sources to know they were blocked (sbl-faq) | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Lots of spam still gets through (put in percent from sbl/sbl-faq) | ||
|x stars! | |||
|- | |- | ||
|require users to request permission to send you e-mail (eg Earthlink spam blocker) | |require users to request permission to send you e-mail (eg Earthlink spam blocker) | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Robots cannot easily send spam | ||
*False identity doesn't work | |||
| | |||
*Emergency emails don't send quickly | |||
*Time consuming to send short notes | |||
*Impossible to implement correctly | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Charge for e-mail sent | |Charge for e-mail sent | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Forces targeted selection | ||
| | |||
*Defeats the purpose of email | |||
*Where does the money go? | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|opt-in for commercial email | |opt-in for commercial email | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Companies can send advertisements without sending spam | ||
*Users can freely restrict the influx of mail from their many online affiliations | |||
| | |||
*There are many fraudulent emails in which the opt-out link sends you to an unwanted web page. | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|domain authentication | |domain authentication | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Very little spam gets through | ||
| | |||
*Lots of false positives | |||
*Could be very difficult for mail servers to initiate contact (certificate negotation crap (see SSH/SSL)) | |||
*Lots of infrastructure and therefore money involved for something as simple as a mail server | |||
*Hard for independents/individuals to set up their own mail server | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bounties | |bounties | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Gets rid of big spammers with incentive | ||
*Possible deterrent | |||
| | |||
*Costs government (tax-payers) money | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|The "goodmail" approach | |The "goodmail" approach | ||
| | | | ||
| | *Mass emails cost money so mass spammers don't work | ||
| | |||
*Companies can bypass the spam filter by paying money | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 77: | Line 99: | ||
|client-side filtering | |client-side filtering | ||
|pro | |pro | ||
| | | | ||
*Only as good as user or algorithms/heuristics at identifying spam | |||
|4 | |4 | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 00:34, 6 July 2007
Spam Prevention Techniques
- block domains or even top-level domains "known" to be large senders of spam
- Spamhaus Block List
- see faq also
- Spamhaus Block List
- require users to request permission to send you e-mail (eg Earthlink spam blocker)
- Charge for e-mail sent
- opt-in for commercial email
- domain authentication
- bounties
- the "goodmail" approach
- bond with escrow agencies
- client-side filtering
Comparison of Spam Prevention Techniques
Technique Name | Pros | Cons | Our Rating |
---|---|---|---|
Block domains of "known" spammers |
|
|
x stars! |
require users to request permission to send you e-mail (eg Earthlink spam blocker) |
|
|
4 |
Charge for e-mail sent |
|
|
4 |
opt-in for commercial email |
|
|
4 |
domain authentication |
|
|
4 |
bounties |
|
|
4 |
The "goodmail" approach |
|
|
4 |
Bonds with escrow agencies | pro | con | 4 |
client-side filtering | pro |
|
4 |
Spam Prevention Technique Details
- Block domains...
- Summary point 1
- Summary point 2
- Link 1
- Require users...
- Charge for email sent