CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2017/E17A0 Team-based reviewing: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==Introduction== ==='''Problem Statement'''=== ---- =='''Issues to be fixed'''==") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
===''' | ==='''Purpose'''=== | ||
Traditionally, only single individuals have been able to perform assignment reviews in Expertiza. Over the years, it has been observed that it would be more desirable if assignment setters could define how a specific assignment could be reviewed. One of the ways will be by an individual, and a new way of reviews will be by teams. The same teams formed for the assignment would be able to participate in reviewing peer assignments. | |||
The benefits of peers reviews are numerous, and there is additional benefit of reviews by teams. In general, we may be getting to a point where traditional individual reviews are becoming ineffective, often missing nuances in an assignments details and concepts. It is a general belief that team-based reviews will address this, often pooling together resources from multiple reviewers working as a team to form a one cohesive and often comprehensive review. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
=='''Issues to be fixed'''== | =='''Issues to be fixed'''== | ||
Revision as of 00:14, 6 November 2017
Introduction
Purpose
Traditionally, only single individuals have been able to perform assignment reviews in Expertiza. Over the years, it has been observed that it would be more desirable if assignment setters could define how a specific assignment could be reviewed. One of the ways will be by an individual, and a new way of reviews will be by teams. The same teams formed for the assignment would be able to participate in reviewing peer assignments.
The benefits of peers reviews are numerous, and there is additional benefit of reviews by teams. In general, we may be getting to a point where traditional individual reviews are becoming ineffective, often missing nuances in an assignments details and concepts. It is a general belief that team-based reviews will address this, often pooling together resources from multiple reviewers working as a team to form a one cohesive and often comprehensive review.