CSC/ECE 517 Spring 2016 E1631 Team-based reviewing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
# If reviewer_is_team is true, the reviewer_id will be a reference to the Teams table. Else, it will be a reference to the Participants table. | # If reviewer_is_team is true, the reviewer_id will be a reference to the Teams table. Else, it will be a reference to the Participants table. | ||
# For an Instructor to specify whether the review is a Team/Individual based review, provide a checkbox on the Review Strategy tab of assignment creation. | # For an Instructor to specify whether the review is a Team/Individual based review, provide a checkbox on the Review Strategy tab of assignment creation. | ||
== Design == | |||
=== Use Case Diagram === | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 2 April 2016
Purpose
- Currently all reviews in Expertiza are done by individuals. This is true regardless of whether the assignment is done by individuals or teams .
- There are occasions when it's advantageous to review projects as a team .
- It helps foster discussion and thereby improves the process of learning.
Task Description
This project comprises of the following steps :
- Add fields to the ResponseMap model to record who reviews whom. The field reviewee_id refers to the team who is being reviewed. The field reviewer_id refers to the individual/team performing the review.
- Add a boolean field reviewer_is_team to identify if the review is performed by a team or an individual.
- If reviewer_is_team is true, the reviewer_id will be a reference to the Teams table. Else, it will be a reference to the Participants table.
- For an Instructor to specify whether the review is a Team/Individual based review, provide a checkbox on the Review Strategy tab of assignment creation.