Talk:CSC/ECE 506 Spring 2014/7b ss: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It would be nice to cover hardware TLB coherence in more detail. | It would be nice to cover hardware TLB coherence in more detail. | ||
Ditto for the validation-based approach, where you have removed some of the existing detail. | |||
There is now a set of seven different schemes described before UNITD. It would be nice to describe how they differ, or put them in some kind of logical order, so they would be easier to remember. | |||
Latest revision as of 03:44, 29 April 2014
Improved the section on the TLB coherence problem in multiprocessing.
Improved the implementation section for TLB shootdown.
It would be nice to cover hardware TLB coherence in more detail.
Ditto for the validation-based approach, where you have removed some of the existing detail.
There is now a set of seven different schemes described before UNITD. It would be nice to describe how they differ, or put them in some kind of logical order, so they would be easier to remember.