CSC/ECE 517 Fall 2009/wiki 1a 7a SJ: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== List of Common Refactorings === | === List of Common Refactorings === | ||
In the following we list some popular refactoring to specify how refactoring transform the code. For more detail information, the reader please refer to the section 2.1.2 of the thesis of Thomas Corbat [1]. [1] | In the following we list some popular refactoring to specify how refactoring transform the code. For more detail information, the reader please refer to the section 2.1.2 of the thesis of Thomas Corbat [1]. [1] provides Ruby examples for each refactorings in this list. | ||
{| | {| | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
| [http://www.activestate.com/komodo/ ActiveState Komodo] || N | | [http://www.activestate.com/komodo/ ActiveState Komodo] || N | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [http://www.netbeans.org/ NetBeans] || | | [http://www.netbeans.org/ NetBeans] || Y | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [http://www.ruby-ide.com/ruby/ruby_ide_and_ruby_editor.php Arachno Ruby] || N | | [http://www.ruby-ide.com/ruby/ruby_ide_and_ruby_editor.php Arachno Ruby] || N | ||
Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Ease of Use and Integrated | === Ease of Use and Integrated Development Environment(IDE) Integration === | ||
The refactoring options for Ruby and Java cover all the basic refactorings. The differences in the number of options mainly come from the difference in the two languages. Ruby is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system#Dynamic_typing dynamically typed language], has unbounded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphism_in_object-oriented_programming polymorphism], and all classes are open to extension or can be inherited. On the other hand, Java is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system#Static_typing statically typed language], polymorphism is mainly implemented via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_%28computer_science%29 interfaces] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implementation_inheritance inheritance], and classes cannot be extended at run-time. The given examples (in section [http://pg-server.csc.ncsu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/CSC/ECE_517_Fall_2009/ | The refactoring options for Ruby and Java cover all the basic refactorings. The differences in the number of options mainly come from the difference in the two languages. Ruby is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system#Dynamic_typing dynamically typed language], has unbounded [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphism_in_object-oriented_programming polymorphism], and all classes are open to extension or can be inherited. On the other hand, Java is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_system#Static_typing statically typed language], polymorphism is mainly implemented via [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_%28computer_science%29 interfaces] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implementation_inheritance inheritance], and classes cannot be extended at run-time. The given examples (in section [http://pg-server.csc.ncsu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/CSC/ECE_517_Fall_2009/wiki_1a_7a_SJ#Example_of_Using_Ruby_Refactoring_Tools_in_Eclipse [2.1]], [http://pg-server.csc.ncsu.edu/mediawiki/index.php/CSC/ECE_517_Fall_2009/wiki_1a_7a_SJ#Example_of_Using_Java_Refactoring_Tools_in_Eclipse [2.2]]) illustrate the ease of use of the refactoring tools for both Ruby and Java and how well these tools are integrated into the Eclipse [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_development_environment IDE]. | ||
== References == | == References == |
Latest revision as of 23:31, 18 September 2009
Refactoring tools for Ruby and Ruby on Rails.
What is Code Refactoring
According to the famous book "Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code " by Martin Fowler: [5], refactoring is the process of applying behavior-preserving transformations to a program with the objective of improving the program’s design. Intuitively people refer to code refactoring as "cleaning it up."
Motivation of Refactoring
Refactoring is very useful for software engineer to maintain the quality of their code in different environment. In fact, no software can be guaranteed to be perfect when it is first developed. Usually when the source code is applied to different customer needs, we want to improve the inner-structure without modify the external behavior. The ability to refactor your code takes the pressure off the design phase of software development. Refactoring gives you the ability to change the design of the code at a later stage. This means that you don’t have to get the design absolutely right before you write any code. You can get a rough design worked out, code it up and then if (when) you spot a better design you can refactor your code towards the better design.
List of Common Refactorings
In the following we list some popular refactoring to specify how refactoring transform the code. For more detail information, the reader please refer to the section 2.1.2 of the thesis of Thomas Corbat [1]. [1] provides Ruby examples for each refactorings in this list.
1. Merge Class Parts |
2. Convert Local Variable to Field |
3. Encapsulate Field |
4. Extract Method |
5. Inline Class |
6. Inline Method |
7. Move Field |
8. Move Method |
9. Rename Class |
10. Rename Field |
11. Rename Local Variable |
12. Rename Method |
13. Replace Temporary Variable with Query |
14. Split Temporary Variable |
Ruby Example of Refactoring
- Before Rename:
def badRenameMethod puts("Hello World"); end
- After Rename:
def hello puts("Hello World"); end
- Before Encapsulation:
class SomeClass def initialize @field = 0; end end
- After Encapsulation:
class SomeClass def initialize @field = 0; end def field @field end private :field def field= field @field = field end private :field= end
Java Example of Refactoring
- Before Rename:
public class rename_method { static void badRenameMethod() { System.out.println("Hello, world!"); } }
- After Rename:
public class rename_method { static void hello() { System.out.println("Hello, world!"); } }
- Before Encapsulation:
public class encap_field { public String field; }
- After Encapsulation:
public class encap_field { private int field; public void setField(int field) { this.field = field; } public int getField() { return field; } }
Refactoring support for Current Ruby IDE
This the following table we summary the current ruby IDE and their refactoring support situation.
Current Ruby IDE | Refactoring Support (Y/N) |
ActiveState Komodo | N |
NetBeans | Y |
Arachno Ruby | N |
FreeRIDE | N |
Mondrian Ruby IDE | N |
Ruby in Steel | N |
RubyMine | Y |
Eclipse (Aptana) | Y |
Example of Using Ruby Refactoring Tools in Eclipse
Here the renaming of the method "badRenameMethod" to "Hello" is illustrated for Ruby. The source code is shown in section 1.3.
Here the encapsulation of the field "field" is illustrated for Ruby. The source code is show in section 1.3.
Example of Using Java Refactoring Tools in Eclipse
Here the renaming of the method "badRenameMethod" to "Hello" is illustrated for Java. The source code is show in section 1.4.
Here the encapsulation of the field "field" is illustrated for Java. The source code is show in section 1.4.
Comparison of Ruby and Java Refactoring Tools
Comprehensiveness
These are the following refactoring options available in eclipse for Ruby and Java.
Refactoring Options for Java in Eclipse | Refactoring Options for Ruby in Eclipse | |
Rename | Rename | |
Move | Move | |
Change Method Signature | Merge Class Parts in File | |
Extract Local Variable | Pull Up | |
Extract Constant | Pull Down | |
Inline | Merge With External Class Parts | |
Convert Anonymous Class to Nested | Split Local Variable | |
Convert Member to Top Level | Merge With External Class Parts | |
Convert Local Variable to Field | Inline | |
Extract Super Class | Extract Constant | |
Extract Interface | Encapsulate Field | |
Extract Class | Convert Local Variable to Field | |
Use Supertype where possible | ||
Pull Up | ||
Pull Down | ||
Introduce Parameter Object | ||
Introduce Indirection | ||
Introduce Factory | ||
Introduce Parameter | ||
Encapsulate Field | ||
Generalize Declared Type | ||
Infer Generic Type Arguments |
Ease of Use and Integrated Development Environment(IDE) Integration
The refactoring options for Ruby and Java cover all the basic refactorings. The differences in the number of options mainly come from the difference in the two languages. Ruby is a dynamically typed language, has unbounded polymorphism, and all classes are open to extension or can be inherited. On the other hand, Java is a statically typed language, polymorphism is mainly implemented via interfaces and inheritance, and classes cannot be extended at run-time. The given examples (in section [2.1], [2.2]) illustrate the ease of use of the refactoring tools for both Ruby and Java and how well these tools are integrated into the Eclipse IDE.
References
[1] Thomas Corbat, Lukas Felber, Mirko Stocker Refactoring Support for the Eclipse Ruby Development Tools, Diploma Thesis, HSR University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil Institute for Software.
[2] Code Refactoring Wiki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_refactoring.
[3] The First Workshop on Refactoring, https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/dig/RefactoringWorkshop
[4] Refactoring Tutorial for Ruby on Rails, http://www.good-tutorials.com/tutorials/ruby-on-rails/refactoring
[5] Martin Fowler Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code