E1833 Fix and improve rubric criteria: Difference between revisions
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Only the owner (an instructor) and his/her TA(s) should be able to edit the corresponding rubric. | Only the owner (an instructor) and his/her TA(s) should be able to edit the corresponding rubric. | ||
===Solution Implemented=== | ===Solution Implemented=== | ||
The first step towards solving this issue was to retrieve id of current user and check its authorization with regards to questionnaire.To achieve this, we are checking if current user is a 'Teaching Assistant' and | The first step towards solving this issue was to retrieve id of current user and check its authorization with regards to questionnaire.To achieve this, we are checking if current user is a 'Teaching Assistant' and his/her 'instructor' has access to current questionnaire. If the instructor has access of questionnaire, his/her Teaching Assistant should also have access to the respective questionnaire. | ||
This is implemented by checking the instructor id of the TA against the question's instructor id. To get the instructor id of a TA, the assign_instructor_id was reused. | |||
===Modified Files=== | ===Modified Files=== | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
==== | ====TA 'teaching_assistant520' belongs to 'instructor6' and has access to question '517 F09 wiki'==== | ||
[[File: | [[File:ta_517wiki1.png]] | ||
====TA teaching_assistant20 | |||
====TA 'teaching_assistant20' belongs 'instructor6' and does not have access to question bilim3==== | |||
[[File:ta520page2.png]] | [[File:ta520page2.png]] | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
==Issue 577== | ==Issue 577== | ||
When logged in as super admin. At the bottom of the rubric, we will find links to import it and export it. | When logged in as super admin. At the bottom of the rubric, we will find links to import it and export it. | ||
Line 73: | Line 75: | ||
Also change name of columns as per advice information extracted. | Also change name of columns as per advice information extracted. | ||
===Solution Implemented=== | ===Solution Implemented=== | ||
In order to implement export functionality for questionnaire, two functions were added to question_advice model namely | In order to implement export functionality for questionnaire, two functions were added to question_advice model namely export_field and export. | ||
Export_fields returns an array of model fields and Export returns the advice data for current questionnaire. A new route has also been defined to handle the question advice export request. Views were also changed to display “Export Advices” instead of “Export Details” in the case of the Question model. | Export_fields returns an array of model fields and Export returns the advice data for current questionnaire. A new route has also been defined to handle the question advice export request. Views were also changed to display “Export Advices” instead of “Export Details” in the case of the Question model. | ||
You can find similar export functionalities in other modules as well including question model. | You can find similar export functionalities in other modules as well including question model. |
Latest revision as of 03:41, 10 November 2018
Introduction
Background
Expertiza is an educational web application created and maintained by the joint efforts of the students and the faculty at NCSU. It’s an open source project developed on Ruby on Rails platform and it’s code is available on Github. It provides a dashboard for all the Assignments corresponding to a course and provides absolute control to the Instructors and Teaching Assistant. In addition to Assignments, it encompasses peer reviews where in participants are allowed to provide feedback anonymously about each other's work thereby providing scope for better outcome.
Problem statement
In Expertiza, instructors (also admin, super admin and TAs) can create rubrics (they are called questionnaires in DB, there are different types like review rubric, teammate review rubric, etc. Each rubric may have one or many criteria (called questions in DB). For each criterion, it may have 0 to many suggestions/advices.
Issues to be resolved
Issue 696
Issue Description: Instructors and TA’s under the same instructor can make changes to each other’s rubric.
Expectations
Only the owner (an instructor) and his/her TA(s) should be able to edit the corresponding rubric.
Solution Implemented
The first step towards solving this issue was to retrieve id of current user and check its authorization with regards to questionnaire.To achieve this, we are checking if current user is a 'Teaching Assistant' and his/her 'instructor' has access to current questionnaire. If the instructor has access of questionnaire, his/her Teaching Assistant should also have access to the respective questionnaire.
This is implemented by checking the instructor id of the TA against the question's instructor id. To get the instructor id of a TA, the assign_instructor_id was reused.
Modified Files
- app/controllers/export_file_controller.rb
- app/controllers/questionnaires_controller.rb
- app/models/question.rb
expertiza/apps/controllers/questionnaires_controller.rb
def action_allowed? if params[:action] == "edit" @questionnaire = Questionnaire.find(params[:id]) (['Super-Administrator', 'Administrator' ].include? current_role_name) || ((['Instructor'].include? current_role_name) && current_user_id?(@questionnaire.try(:instructor_id))) || ((['Teaching Assistant'].include? current_role_name) && assign_instructor_id == @questionnaire.try(:instructor_id)) else ['Super-Administrator', 'Administrator', 'Instructor', 'Teaching Assistant', 'Student'].include? current_role_name end end
expertiza/app/controllers/export_file_controller.rb
def start @model = params[:model]%> titles = {"Assignment" => "Grades", "CourseParticipant" => "Course Participants", "AssignmentTeam" => "Teams", "CourseTeam" => "Teams", "User" => "Users", "Question" => "Questions"} @title = titles[@model] @id = params[:id] end
expertiza/app/models/question.rb
def self.export_fields(_options) fields = ["Seq", "Question", "Type", "Weight", "text area size", "max_label", "min_label"] fields end
TA 'teaching_assistant520' belongs to 'instructor6' and has access to question '517 F09 wiki'
TA 'teaching_assistant20' belongs 'instructor6' and does not have access to question bilim3
Issue 577
When logged in as super admin. At the bottom of the rubric, we will find links to import it and export it. The Export Details does not work and is not relevant to the context. Export page does not display the names of the rubric. When a rubric is exported, the headers on each column were incorrect and not related to the rubric. It seems to be headers from an export of information on users.
Expectations
Export page needs to give the name of the rubric When a rubric is exported, the column names should be proper. Exporting "details" for rubrics should mean exporting the advice associated with the rubrics. And then could rename "export details" to "export advice". Also change name of columns as per advice information extracted.
Solution Implemented
In order to implement export functionality for questionnaire, two functions were added to question_advice model namely export_field and export. Export_fields returns an array of model fields and Export returns the advice data for current questionnaire. A new route has also been defined to handle the question advice export request. Views were also changed to display “Export Advices” instead of “Export Details” in the case of the Question model. You can find similar export functionalities in other modules as well including question model.
Modified Files
- app/controllers/export_file_controller.rb
- app/views/export_file/start.html.erb
- app/config/routes.rb
- app/models/question_advice.rb
expertiza/app/controllers/export_file_controller.rb
def export_advices @delim_type = params[:delim_type] filename, delimiter = find_delim_filename(@delim_type, params[:other_char]) allowed_models = ['Question'] advice_model = 'QuestionAdvice' csv_data = CSV.generate(col_sep: delimiter) do |csv| if allowed_models.include? params[:model] csv << Object.const_get(advice_model).export_fields(params[:options]) Object.const_get(advice_model).export(csv, params[:id], params[:options]) end end send_data csv_data, type: 'text/csv; charset=iso-8859-1; header=present', disposition: "attachment; filename=#{filename}" end
expertiza/app/models/question_advice.rb
class QuestionAdvice < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :question def self.export_fields(_options) fields = [] QuestionAdvice.columns.each do |column| fields.push(column.name) end fields end def self.export(csv, parent_id, _options) questionnaire = Questionnaire.find(parent_id) questions = questionnaire.questions questions.each do |question| question_advices = QuestionAdvice.where("question_id = ?", question.id) question_advices.each do |advice| tcsv = [] advice.attributes.each_pair do |_name, value| tcsv.push(value) end csv << tcsv end end end end
expertiza/app/views/export_file/start.html.erb
<% if @model == 'Question' %> <h2>Export Advices</h2> <%= form_tag({:controller => 'export_file', :action => 'export_advices'}, {:method => 'post', :multipart => true, :name => 'export_advices'}) do %> <table> <tr> <td valign='Top'>Delimiter:</td> <td> <%= radio_button_tag 'delim_type', 'comma', true %> Comma<br/> <%= radio_button_tag 'delim_type', 'space' %> Space<br/> <%= radio_button_tag 'delim_type', 'tab' %> Tab<br/> <%= radio_button_tag 'delim_type', 'other' %> Other <%= text_field_tag 'other_char' %> <br/> </td> </tr> </table> <br/> <%= hidden_field_tag('model', @model) %> <%= hidden_field_tag('id', @id) %> <input type='submit' value='Export Advices' onclick='{export_advices.submit();}'/> <br/><br/> <% end %>
expertiza/app/config/routes.rb
resources :export_file, only: [] do collection do get :start get :export post :export post :exportdetails post :export_advices end end
Export Advices Output File
Test Plan
Issue 696
There were no existing test cases for the Questionnaires_controller. We have made changes in questionnaires_controller_spec.rb which covers testing scenarios to check access over questionnaire module as per the role defined in the system i.e. for roles Instructor, TA and admin. The specs were run on the previous and current files and they return the same results implying that the changed code does not break anything. Below are the test Scenarios covered:
- when the role name of current user is super admin or admin.
- when current user is the instructor of current questionnaires.
- when current user is the ta of the course which current questionnaires belongs to.
- when current user is a ta but not the ta of the course which current questionnaires belongs to.
- when current user is the instructor of the course which current questionnaires belongs to.
- when current user is an instructor but not the instructor of current course or current questionnaires.
Issue 577
There was no implementation in place to export question advice associated with questionnaires. We have created a new file question_advice_spec.rb to test question_advice.rb model. Test case is created to test both the methods i.e export_field and export.
Manual Test
Below are the steps to perform manual testing for the issues resolved.
Issue 696: 'Teaching_assistant520' has access to review 'review/517 F09 wiki'
- Step 1: Login as teaching_assistant520/password
- Step 2: Navigate to path manage->Questionnaires-> Review rubric
- Step 3: Select questionnaire named Review from the list, which Teaching Assistant has access to.
- Step 4: Choose question 517 F09 wiki and click on edit question button(pencil symbol).
- Step 5: Teaching Assistant should be able to edit the questionnaire.(If Instructor/Teaching assistant does not have access to current questionnaire, system will show an error message).
Issue 577: 'Teaching_assistant520' and 'Instructor' has access to review 'review/517 F09 wiki'
- Step 1: Login as instructor/password or teaching_assistant520/password
- Step 2: Navigate to path manage->Questionnaires-> Review rubric
- Step 3: Select questionnaire named Review from the list, which Instructor/Teaching Assistant has access to.
- Step 4: Choose question 517 F09 wiki and click on edit question button(pencil symbol).
- Step 5: Click on the link 'Export questionnaire' at the bottom of the page.
- Step 6: Top of the page shows Export Questions. When clicked of export, you will be able to export questionnaire for current rubric.
- Step 7: Bottom of the navigated page will show 'Export Advices'. When clicked on Export, you will be able to export advices for current rubric.
Rspec Changes
expertiza/spec/controllers/questionnaires_controller_spec.rb
Issue 696:
def check_access username stub_current_user(username,username.role.name,username.role) expect(controller.send(:action_allowed?)) end describe '#action_allowed?' do let(:questionnaire) { build(:questionnaire, id: 1) } let(:instructor) { build(:instructor, id: 1) } let(:ta) { build(:teaching_assistant, id: 10, parent_id: 66) } context 'when params action is edit or update' do before(:each) do controller.params = {id: '1', action: 'edit'} controller.request.session[:user] = instructor end context 'when the role name of current user is super admin or admin' do it 'allows certain action' do check_access(admin).to be true end end context 'when current user is the instructor of current questionnaires' do it 'allows certain action' do check_access(instructor).to be true end end context 'when current user is the ta of the course which current questionnaires belongs to' do it 'allows certain action' do allow(TaMapping).to receive(:exists?).with(ta_id: 8, course_id: 1).and_return(true) check_access(ta).to be true end end context 'when current user is a ta but not the ta of the course which current questionnaires belongs to' do it 'does not allow certain action' do allow(TaMapping).to receive(:exists?).with(ta_id: 10, course_id: 1).and_return(false) controller.request.session[:user] = instructor2 check_access(ta).to be false end end context 'when current user is the instructor of the course which current questionnaires belongs to' do it 'allows certain action' do allow(Course).to receive(:find).with(1).and_return(double('Course', instructor_id: 6)) check_access(instructor).to be true end end context 'when current user is an instructor but not the instructor of current course or current questionnaires' do it 'does not allow certain action' do allow(Course).to receive(:find).with(1).and_return(double('Course', instructor_id: 66)) check_access(instructor2).to be false end end end context 'when params action is not edit and update' do before(:each) do controller.params = {id: '1', action: 'new'} end context 'when the role current user is super admin/admin/instructor/ta' do it 'allows certain action except edit and update' do check_access(admin).to be true end end end end
expertiza/spec/controllers/question_advice_spec.rb
Issue 577:
describe QuestionAdvice do let(:questionnaire) { Questionnaire.new id: 1, name: "abc", private: 0, min_question_score: 0, max_question_score: 10, instructor_id: 1234 } let(:question) { build(:question, id: 1) } let(:question_advice) { build(:question_advice) } describe 'has correct csv values?' do before(:each) do create(:questionnaire) create(:question) create(:question_advice) @options = {} end def generated_csv(t_questionnaire, t_options) delimiter = ',' CSV.generate(col_sep: delimiter) do |csv| csv << QuestionAdvice.export_fields(t_options) QuestionAdvice.export(csv, t_questionnaire.id, t_options) end end it 'checks_if_csv has the correct question advice data' do expected_csv = File.read('spec/features/question_advice_export_csv/expected_question_advice_export_csv.txt') expect(generated_csv(questionnaire, @options)).to eq(expected_csv) end end end
External Links
- Link to forked repository [[1]]
References
Expertiza
Expertiza Github
Expertiza Documentation